Literature DB >> 1939892

Dynamic processes in the precedence effect.

R L Freyman1, R K Clifton, R Y Litovsky.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to investigate the dependence of echo suppression on the auditory stimulation just prior to a test stimulus. Subjects sat in an anechoic chamber between two loudspeakers, one which presented the "lead" sound, and the other the delayed "lag" sound. In the first experiment, subjects reported whether or not they heard an echo coming from the vicinity of the lag loudspeaker during a test click pair. In seven of nine listeners, perception of the lagging sound was strongly diminished by the presence of a train of "conditioning" clicks presented just before the test click. Echo threshold increased (subjects were less sensitive to echoes) as the number of clicks in the train increased from 3 to 17. For a fixed number of clicks, the effect was essentially independent of click rate (from 1/s through 50/s) and duration of the train (from 0.5 through 8 s). A second experiment demonstrated a similar buildup of echo suppression with white noise bursts, regardless of whether the bursts in the conditioning train were repeated samples of frozen noise, or were independent samples of noise. Using an objective procedure for measuring echo threshold, the third experiment demonstrated that both lead and lag stimuli must be presented during the conditioning train in order to produce the buildup of suppression. When only the lead sound was presented during the conditioning train, the perceptibility of the lag sound during the test burst appeared to be enhanced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1939892     DOI: 10.1121/1.401955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  The effect of an additional reflection in a precedence effect experiment.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Gongqiang Yu; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Eugene Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Trading of interaural differences in high-rate Gabor click trains.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Release and re-buildup of listeners' models of auditory space.

Authors:  Rachel Keen; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Predicting echo thresholds from speech onset characteristics.

Authors:  Scott D Miller; Ruth Y Litovsky; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Time-forward speech intelligibility in time-reversed rooms.

Authors:  Laricia Longworth-Reed; Eugene Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Echolocation versus echo suppression in humans.

Authors:  Ludwig Wallmeier; Nikodemus Geßele; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Attention is critical for spatial auditory object formation.

Authors:  Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Rachel Keen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Isolating mechanisms that influence measures of the precedence effect: theoretical predictions and behavioral tests.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.