Literature DB >> 17902855

A comparative study of distortion-product-otoacoustic-emission fine structure in human newborns and adults with normal hearing.

Sumitrajit Dhar1, Carolina Abdala.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) measured in human newborns are not adult-like. More than a decade of work from various investigators has created a well-developed body of evidence describing these differences but the putative anatomy or physiology has only been partially explained. Recently, Abdala and Keefe [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 3832-3842 (2006)] have identified outer and middle ear immaturities that at least partially describe the differences observed between newborn and adult input-output functions and suppression tuning curves. DPOAE fine structure characteristics and their maturation have not been examined to any extent in the literature. Fine structure characteristics in two groups of ten newborns and young adults with normal hearing sensitivity are compared here. Consistent with previous reports, the newborns show higher DPOAE levels; greater fine structure depth and wider fine structure spacing is also observed in the newborns. Differences in fine structure morphology are also observed between the two age groups. While some of these findings are attributable to an immature outer and middle ear system in the newborns, it is argued that some observed differences in fine structure characteristics might be due to remnant immaturities in passive motion of the basilar membrane in the newborn cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17902855     DOI: 10.1121/1.2770544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Considering distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure in measurements of the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Srikanta K Mishra; Tracy L Williams
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission phase and component analysis in human newborns.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Ryan Deeter; Rebekah Abel; Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The spiral staircase: tonotopic microstructure and cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Characterizing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Maturation and aging of the human cochlea: a view through the DPOAE looking glass.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-03

8.  Changes in the DP-gram during the preterm and early postnatal period.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sandra I Oba; Rangasamy Ramanathan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Emily C Bosen; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Examining the Factors that Contribute to Non-Monotonic Growth of the [Formula: see text] Otoacoustic Emission in Humans.

Authors:  Mackenzie L Mills; Yi Shen; Robert H Withnell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.