Literature DB >> 22305346

Left lateralizing transcranial direct current stimulation improves reading efficiency.

Peter E Turkeltaub1, Jennifer Benson2, Roy H Hamilton2, Abhishek Datta3, Marom Bikson3, H Branch Coslett2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor reading efficiency is the most persistent problem for adults with developmental dyslexia. Previous research has demonstrated a relationship between left posterior temporal cortex (pTC) function and reading ability, regardless of dyslexia status. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: In this study, we tested whether enhancing left lateralization of pTC using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improves reading efficiency in adults without dyslexia.
METHOD: Twenty-five right-handed adults with no history of learning disorder participated. Real and sham "Left lateralizing" tDCS were applied to the pTC in separate sessions. Standardized word and nonword reading tests were given immediately after stimulation.
RESULTS: Modeling of the induced electrical field confirmed that tDCS was likely to increase left pTC excitability and reduce right pTC excitability as intended. Relative to sham, real tDCS induced improvements in word reading efficiency in below average readers.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing left lateralization of the pTC using tDCS improves word reading efficiency in below-average readers. This demonstrates that left lateralization of the pTC plays a role in reading ability, and provides stimulation parameters that could be used for a trial of tDCS in adults with developmental dyslexia. Such short-term gains could amplify the effect of appropriate reading interventions when performed in conjunction with them.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22305346      PMCID: PMC3346858          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  29 in total

1.  Development of neural mechanisms for reading.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub; Lynn Gareau; D Lynn Flowers; Thomas A Zeffiro; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation improves word retrieval in healthy and nonfluent aphasic subjects.

Authors:  Valentina Fiori; Michela Coccia; Chiara V Marinelli; Veronica Vecchi; Silvia Bonifazi; M Gabriella Ceravolo; Leandro Provinciali; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Paola Marangolo
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation elicits coupled neural and hemodynamic consequences.

Authors:  Elena A Allen; Brian N Pasley; Thang Duong; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients.

Authors:  Paulo S Boggio; Alice Nunes; Sergio P Rigonatti; Michael A Nitsche; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity.

Authors:  E Paulesu; J F Démonet; F Fazio; E McCrory; V Chanoine; N Brunswick; S F Cappa; G Cossu; M Habib; C D Frith; U Frith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Acquired dyslexia.

Authors:  H B Coslett
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.420

7.  Age-related changes in regional brain activation during phonological decoding and printed word recognition.

Authors:  P G Simos; J I Breier; J M Fletcher; B R Foorman; A Mouzaki; A C Papanicolaou
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training.

Authors:  P G Simos; J M Fletcher; E Bergman; J I Breier; B R Foorman; E M Castillo; R N Davis; M Fitzgerald; A C Papanicolaou
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: evidence from functional MRI.

Authors:  Elise Temple; Gayle K Deutsch; Russell A Poldrack; Steven L Miller; Paula Tallal; Michael M Merzenich; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals.

Authors:  M B Iyer; U Mattu; J Grafman; M Lomarev; S Sato; E M Wassermann
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  35 in total

1.  Augmenting cognitive training in older adults (The ACT Study): Design and Methods of a Phase III tDCS and cognitive training trial.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Ronald Cohen; Michael Marsiske; Gene E Alexander; Sara J Czaja; Samuel Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  Neural Noise Hypothesis of Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Roeland Hancock; Kenneth R Pugh; Fumiko Hoeft
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Vaughn Bryant; Daniela Sacchetti; Felix Gervits; Roy Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Reading proficiency influences the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence from selective modulation of dorsal and ventral pathways of reading in bilinguals.

Authors:  Sagarika Bhattacharjee; Rajan Kashyap; Beth Ann O'Brien; Michael McCloskey; Kenichi Oishi; John E Desmond; Brenda Rapp; S H Annabel Chen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Changing head model extent affects finite element predictions of transcranial direct current stimulation distributions.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Benjamin Schwartz; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations.

Authors:  Berkan Guleyupoglu; Pedro Schestatsky; Dylan Edwards; Felipe Fregni; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 7.  Neuroelectronics and Biooptics: Closed-Loop Technologies in Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Esther Krook-Magnuson; Jennifer N Gelinas; Ivan Soltesz; György Buzsáki
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 18.302

8.  Benchmarking transcranial electrical stimulation finite element models: a comparison study.

Authors:  Aprinda Indahlastari; Munish Chauhan; Rosalind J Sadleir
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of primary progressive aphasia: An open-label pilot study.

Authors:  Felix Gervits; Sharon Ash; H Branch Coslett; Katya Rascovsky; Murray Grossman; Roy Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.