Literature DB >> 11682346

Quantitative analysis of the electroencephalogram during cranial electrotherapy stimulation.

M J Schroeder1, R E Barr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Normal individuals were used to quantitate electroencephalographic (EEG) changes during concurrent administration of 0.5 and 100 Hz cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES).
METHODS: Twelve normal, right-handed males were used in a randomized, double-blind crossover design study. A 3 amplifier system incorporating noise-cancellation was used to collect one channel of EEG (O1-Cz configuration) for 30 min. Either 0.5, 100 Hz, or sham CES treatment was administered for 20 min of each session. Statistical analyses were applied to time- and frequency-domain EEG variables.
RESULTS: Relative to sham control, 0.5 and 100 Hz CES caused the alpha band mean frequency to shift downward. Additionally, 100 Hz CES also caused a decrease of the alpha band median frequency and beta band power fraction.
CONCLUSIONS: Both 0.5 and 100 Hz CES provide frequency distribution shifts that suggest beneficial changes in mental state. However, compared to 0.5 Hz CES, 100 Hz CES effected a greater overall change. It is suggested that similar tests be performed on individuals with various behavioral and neurological disorders to determine if comparable EEG changes can be realized and correlated with beneficial effects of CES therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11682346     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00657-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  10 in total

1.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad.

Authors:  Abhishek Datta; Varun Bansal; Julian Diaz; Jinal Patel; Davide Reato; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation induces both acute and persistent changes in broadband cortical synchronization: a simultaneous tDCS-EEG study.

Authors:  Abhrajeet Roy; Bryan Baxter; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Induction of self awareness in dreams through frontal low current stimulation of gamma activity.

Authors:  Ursula Voss; Romain Holzmann; Allan Hobson; Walter Paulus; Judith Koppehele-Gossel; Ansgar Klimke; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Cranial electrostimulation improves slow wave sleep in collegiate population: a polysomnographic study.

Authors:  Anam Aseem; Neera Chaudhry; Mohammed Ejaz Hussain
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

5.  Quantitative Electroencephalography Analysis (qEEG) of Neuro-Electro-Adaptive Therapy 12™ [NEAT12] Up-Regulates Cortical Potentials in an Alcoholic during Protracted Abstinence: Putative Anti-Craving Implications.

Authors:  Roger L Waite; Marlene Oscar-Berman; Eric RBraverman; Debmalya Barh; Kenneth Blum
Journal:  J Addict Res Ther       Date:  2014

6.  Randomized sham controlled trial of cranial microcurrent stimulation for symptoms of depression, anxiety, pain, fatigue and sleep disturbances in women receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Debra Lyon; Debra Kelly; Jeanne Walter; Harry Bear; Leroy Thacker; Ronald K Elswick
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-07-23

Review 7.  Methodological dimensions of transcranial brain stimulation with the electrical current in human.

Authors:  Maryam Rostami; Mehrshad Golesorkhi; Hamed Ekhtiari
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013

8.  Effects of cranial electrotherapy stimulation on resting state brain activity.

Authors:  Jamie D Feusner; Sarah Madsen; Teena D Moody; Cara Bohon; Emily Hembacher; Susan Y Bookheimer; Alexander Bystritsky
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Novel bifunctional cap for simultaneous electroencephalography and transcranial electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Sophia Wunder; Alexander Hunold; Patrique Fiedler; Falk Schlegelmilch; Klaus Schellhorn; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of cranial electrotherapy stimulation on preoperative anxiety and blood pressure during anesthetic induction in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  Hee Won Kang; Hyun Joong Kim; Woon Young Kim; Won Kee Min; Too Jae Min; Yoon Sook Lee; Jae Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.671

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.