Physician network position and patient outcomes following implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two novel measures of physician network centrality and their associations with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) procedure volume and health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Medicare claims and the National Cardiovascular Data Registry data from 2007 to 2011. STUDY
DESIGN: We constructed a national cardiovascular disease patient-sharing physician network and used network analysis to characterize physician network centrality with two measures: within-hospital degree centrality (number of connections within a hospital) and across-hospital degree centrality (number of connections across hospitals). The primary outcome was risk-adjusted 2-year case fatality. Hierarchical logistic regression estimated the effects of physician's within-hospital and across-hospital degree centrality on case fatality. We included 105 109 ICD therapy patients and 3474 ICD implanting physicians in our analyses. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: After controlling for other physician and hospital characteristics, we observed greater risk-adjusted case fatality among patients treated by physicians in the highest across-hospital degree tertile compared to lowest tertile (OR [95% CI] = 1.10 [1.04-1.16], P = 0.001) and lowest tertile volume physicians compared with highest volume (OR [95% CI] = 0.90 [0.84-0.95], P < 0.001). Physician's within-hospital degree tertile was inversely associated with case fatality but not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Degree centrality measures capture information independent of procedure volume and raise questions about the quality of physicians with networks that predict worse health outcomes. © Health Research and Educational Trust.