Literature DB >> 28194616

Impact of Fellow Versus Resident Assistance on Outcomes Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Rosalie A Carr1, Catherine W Chung1, Christian M Schmidt1, Andrea Jester1, Molly E Kilbane1, Michael G House1, Nicholas J Zyromski1, Attila Nakeeb1, C Max Schmidt1, Eugene P Ceppa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Participation by surgical trainees in complex procedures is key to their development as future practicing surgeons. The impact of surgical fellows versus general surgery resident assistance on outcomes in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has not been well studied. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in patient outcomes based on level of surgical trainee.
METHODS: Consecutive cases of PD (n = 254) were reviewed at a single high-volume institution over a 2-year period (July 2013-June 2015). Thirty-day outcomes were monitored through the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Quality In-Training Initiative. Patient outcomes were compared between PD assisted by general surgery residents versus hepatopancreatobiliary fellows.
RESULTS: The hepatopancreatobiliary surgery fellows and general surgery residents participated in 109 and 145 PDs, respectively. The incidence of each individual postoperative complication (renal, infectious, pancreatectomy-specific, and cardiopulmonary), total morbidity, mortality, and failure to rescue were the same between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient operative outcomes were the same between fellow- and resident-assisted PD. These results suggest that hepatopancreatobiliary surgery fellows and general surgery residents should be offered the same opportunities to participate in complex general surgery procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACS-NSQIP; Fellow; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Resident; Surgical education

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28194616     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3383-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  35 in total

1.  Impact of Resident Involvement in Surgery (IRIS-NSQIP): Looking at the Bigger Picture Based on the American College of Surgeons-NSQIP Database.

Authors:  Antoine N Saliba; Ali T Taher; Hani Tamim; Afif R Harb; Aurelie Mailhac; Amr Radwan; Faek R Jamali
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Quality in-training initiative--a solution to the need for education in quality improvement: results from a survey of program directors.

Authors:  Rachel R Kelz; Morgan M Sellers; Caroline E Reinke; Rachel L Medbery; Jon Morris; Clifford Ko
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Resident participation and postoperative outcomes in adrenal surgery.

Authors:  Raghunandan Venkat; Patricio L Valdivia; Marlon A Guerrero
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Does resident involvement effect surgical times and complication rates during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis? An analysis of 16,849 cases from the ACS-NSQIP.

Authors:  Vriti Advani; Sajida Ahad; Chad Gonczy; Steven Markwell; Imran Hassan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Effects of resident involvement on complication rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Bradley N Reames; Arthur M Carlin; John D Birkmeyer; Jonathan F Finks
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Resident participation does not affect surgical outcomes, despite introduction of new techniques.

Authors:  Shaun P Patel; Paul G Gauger; David L Brown; Michael J Englesbe; Paul S Cederna
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Does resident post graduate year influence the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair?

Authors:  Mark Wilkiemeyer; Theodore N Pappas; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Kamal M F Itani; Olga Jonasson; Leigh A Neumayer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Adrenalectomy outcomes are superior with the participation of residents and fellows.

Authors:  Carolyn D Seib; David Y Greenblatt; Michael J Campbell; Wen T Shen; Jessica E Gosnell; Orlo H Clark; Quan-Yang Duh
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Does resident experience affect outcomes in complex abdominal surgery? Pancreaticoduodenectomy as an example.

Authors:  Daniel M Relles; Richard A Burkhart; Michael J Pucci; Jocelyn Sendecki; Renee Tholey; Ross Drueding; Patricia K Sauter; Eugene P Kennedy; Jordan M Winter; Harish Lavu; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Comparison of pediatric appendectomy outcomes between pediatric surgeons and general surgery residents.

Authors:  Ido Mizrahi; Haggi Mazeh; Yair Levy; Gilad Karavani; Muhammad Ghanem; Yaron Armon; Amos Vromen; Ahmed Eid; Raphael Udassin
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.192

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy.

Authors:  Donald K Groves; Maria S Altieri; Brianne Sullivan; Jie Yang; Mark A Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  See (n)One, Do (n)One, Teach (n)One: Reality of Surgical Resident Training in Germany.

Authors:  T Huber; I Richardsen; C Klinger; M Mille; A A Roeth
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Complications and Readmissions Associated with First Assistant Training Level Following Elective Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Tarik K Yuce; Amy Holmstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Alexander P Nagle; Eric S Hungness; Ryan P Merkow; Ezra N Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.267

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.