Literature DB >> 28864848

Lessons learned from 300 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies over a 25-year experience: the "safety net" improves the outcomes beyond surgeon skills.

Roberto Santoro1, Roberto Luca Meniconi2, Pasquale Lepiane1, Giovanni Vennarecci1, Gianluca Mascianà1, Marco Colasanti1, Eugenio Santoro1, Giuseppe Maria Ettorre1.   

Abstract

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is associated with high postoperative morbidity. The management of postoperative complications is paramount for reducing the mortality rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of surgical and hospital experience on outcomes by comparing postoperative results in three different hospitals with increasing resources for supporting the same surgical team. Patients data and surgical outcome of 300 consecutive patients undergoing PD were collected prospectively in the department database and divided into three periods (A = 1990-2000, B = 2001-March 2007, C = April 2007-2015). Pancreatico-jejunostomy was the procedure of choice between 1995 and 2004, and pancreatico-gastrostomy was performed afterwards. In the periods A, B and C, a total of 78, 85 and 137 PD were performed, respectively, and the number of PDs per year increased from 5 to 25. Between the three periods, the death rate (10.4 vs. 6 vs. 1.6%, p = 0.01) and intraoperative RBC transfusion rate (84.9 vs. 42.4 vs. 6.5%, p = 0.01) decreased significantly, whereas the vascular resection rate increased significantly (1.2 vs. 7 vs. 14.5, p < 0.002). Morbidity and reoperation rates did not change significantly between the three periods as well as operative time and median length of stay. Infectious complications and sepsis represented the most frequent major complication. Massive bleeding associated with uncontrolled pancreatic leak represented the major cause of morbidity and reoperation in the three periods, however, the relative mortality rate decreased significantly with no deaths in the last period. PD remains a challenging procedure with high morbidity and mortality rate. A multidisciplinary pancreatic team represents the "safety net" of pancreatic surgeon because it improves the results beyond the surgeon skills and experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Morbidity; Mortality; Multidisciplinary; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Safety net

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28864848     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0490-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  40 in total

Review 1.  The role of the infectious disease specialist in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  T J Rush
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  A reminiscence: pancreaticduodenectomy.

Authors:  A O WHIPPLE
Journal:  Rev Surg       Date:  1963 Jul-Aug

3.  Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant.

Authors:  M I van Berge Henegouwen; L T De Wit; T M Van Gulik; H Obertop; D J Gouma
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  Preoperative Pancreatic Resection (PREPARE) score: a prospective multicenter-based morbidity risk score.

Authors:  Faik G Uzunoglu; Matthias Reeh; Eik Vettorazzi; Till Ruschke; Philipp Hannah; Michael F Nentwich; Yogesh K Vashist; Dean Bogoevski; Alexandra König; Monika Janot; Francesca Gavazzi; Alessandro Zerbi; Valentina Todaro; Giuseppe Malleo; Waldemar Uhl; Marco Montorsi; Claudio Bassi; Jakob R Izbicki; Maximilian Bockhorn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Outcomes Improvement Is Not Continuous Along the Learning Curve for Pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Hospital Level.

Authors:  Taylor M Coe; Zhi Ven Fong; Samuel E Wilson; Mark A Talamini; Keith D Lillemoe; David C Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Conservative management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy.

Authors:  Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand; Alain Sauvanet; Alban Denys; Annie Sibert; Valérie Vilgrain; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Nicolò Pecorelli; Riccardo Ariotti; Giovanni Capretti; Massimiliano Greco; Gianpaolo Balzano; Renato Castoldi; Luigi Beretta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Delayed massive arterial hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer. Management of a life-threatening complication.

Authors:  Roberto Santoro; Massimo Carlini; Fabio Carboni; Christelle Nicolas; Eugenio Santoro
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.