Literature DB >> 20643522

Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT.

Ting-Yim Lee1, Rethy K Chhem.   

Abstract

The introduction of slip ring technology enables helical CT scanning in the late 1980's and has rejuvenated CT's role in diagnostic imaging. Helical CT scanning has made possible whole body scanning in a single breath hold and computed tomography angiography (CTA) which has replaced invasive catheter based angiography in many cases because of its easy of operation and lesser risk to patients. However, a series of recent articles and accidents have heightened the concern of radiation risk from CT scanning. Undoubtedly, the radiation dose from CT studies, in particular, CCTA studies, are among the highest dose studies in diagnostic imaging. Nevertheless, CT has remained the workhorse of diagnostic imaging in emergent and non-emergent situations because of their ubiquitous presence in medical facilities from large academic to small regional hospitals and their round the clock accessibility due to their ease of use for both staff and patients as compared to MR scanners. The legitimate concern of radiation dose has sparked discussions on the risk vs benefit of CT scanning. It is recognized that newer CT applications, like CCTA and perfusion, will be severely curtailed unless radiation dose is reduced. This paper discusses the various hardware and software techniques developed to reduce radiation dose to patients in CT scanning. The current average effective dose of a CT study is ∼10 mSv, with the implementation of dose reduction techniques discussed herein; it is realistic to expect that the average effective dose may be decreased by 2-3 fold.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643522     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  23 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative analysis of emphysema and airway measurements according to iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison of filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Ji Yung Choo; Jin Mo Goo; Chang Hyun Lee; Chang Min Park; Sang Joon Park; Mi-Suk Shim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Low-dose CT perfusion with projection view sharing.

Authors:  Thomas Martin; John Hoffman; Jeff R Alger; Michael McNitt-Gray; Danny Jj Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Lowering the dose in head CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  K Kilic; G Erbas; M Guryildirim; M Arac; E Ilgit; B Coskun
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection for body CTA: Performance evaluation of 192-slice dual-source CT.

Authors:  Anna Winklehner; Sonja Gordic; Eliane Lauk; Thomas Frauenfelder; Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi; Daniela B Husarik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Fabio Becce; Yosr Ben Salah; Francis R Verdun; Bruno C Vande Berg; Frederic E Lecouvet; Reto Meuli; Patrick Omoumi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: technical principles.

Authors:  Martin J Willemink; Pim A de Jong; Tim Leiner; Linda M de Heer; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Ricardo P J Budde; Arnold M R Schilham
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The impact of a new model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm on prosthetic heart valve related artifacts at reduced radiation dose MDCT.

Authors:  Dominika Suchá; Martin J Willemink; Pim A de Jong; Arnold M R Schilham; Tim Leiner; Petr Symersky; Ricardo P J Budde
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Frequency-Selective Computed Tomography: Applications During Periodic Thoracic Motion.

Authors:  Jacob Herrmann; Eric A Hoffman; David W Kaczka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Carbon dioxide insufflation in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces mediastinal emphysema: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Dai Hirasawa; Naotaka Fujita; Tetsuya Ohira; Yoshihiro Harada; Taku Yamagata; Yoshiki Koike; Kenjirou Suzuki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines.

Authors:  Richard Wender; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Ermilo Barrera; Graham A Colditz; Timothy R Church; David S Ettinger; Ruth Etzioni; Christopher R Flowers; G Scott Gazelle; Douglas K Kelsey; Samuel J LaMonte; James S Michaelson; Kevin C Oeffinger; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Daniel C Sullivan; William Travis; Louise Walter; Andrew M D Wolf; Otis W Brawley; Robert A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.