Literature DB >> 20635165

Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening above age 75: outcomes in symptomatic african american and Hispanic adults.

Shashideep Singhal1, Arun Verma, Kris Anand.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against routine screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in adults above 75 years of age. Considerations to support screening in an individual patient are not clearly described. There is limited data to support recommendations in African American (AA) and Hispanics population.
METHODS: We reviewed records of 568 inpatient colonoscopies carried out at our Mt. Sinai Hospital Medical Center, Chicago during 2006-2008 for symptomatic adults ≥75 years of age. Subjects with previous normal screening colonoscopies and presence of one or more "generally indicated" indications as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines were included in the study.
RESULTS: A total of 155 adults (mean age, 81.8 years; 29% males and 71% females; 83.8% AAs and 16.1% Hispanics) met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-nine percent had one previous colonoscopy, whereas 21% of the patients had two or more previous colonoscopies. Common indications for a repeat colonoscopy were anemia 69.7%, hematochezia 39.4%, and fecal occult blood 19.4%. Colonoscopy was completed to the cecum in 65.2% of the subjects. Advanced adenomas/cancers were found in 15/155 (9.7%) colonoscopies. CRC detection rate was 14/155 (9%), of which 9/14 (75%) were staged III/IV. Two (1.3%) patients had complications which resolved conservatively.
CONCLUSION: Symptomatic AAs and Hispanics ≥75 have a high incidence of CRC despite a previous normal colonoscopy. Presence of male sex, new onset anemia and hematochezia, and longer colonoscopy intervals are associated with CRC detection on colonoscopy. The detection of advanced cancer and high comorbidity/low life expectancy limit the benefit of CRC detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20635165     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-010-9190-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  15 in total

1.  Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  R M Ness; R Manam; H Hoen; N Chalasani
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Robert H Fletcher; Jonathon S Stillman; Michael J O'Brien; Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; David A Lieberman; Randall W Burt; Theodore R Levin; John H Bond; Durado Brooks; Tim Byers; Neil Hyman; Lynne Kirk; Alan Thorson; Clifford Simmang; David Johnson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colo-rectal cancer: a practical approach.

Authors:  F Parente; B Marino; C Crosta
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.088

5.  Repeat-screening colonoscopy 5 years after normal baseline-screening colonoscopy in average-risk Chinese: a prospective study.

Authors:  Wai K Leung; James Yw Lau; Bing Yee Suen; Grace Lh Wong; Dorothy Kl Chow; Larry H Lai; Ka-Fai To; Carmen Km Yim; Envy Sf Lee; Kelvin Kf Tsoi; Simon Sm Ng; Joseph Jy Sung
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Elizabeth A Glowinski; Ching Lin-Cooper; Gregory N Larkin; James D Rogge; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Outcome of colonoscopy in elderly African-American patients.

Authors:  Duane T Smoot; Jason Collins; Sharif Dunlap; Amira Ali-Ibrahim; Mehdi Nouraie; Edward L Lee; Hassan Ashktorab
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Bowel preparations for colonoscopy: a review.

Authors:  Gary Lichtenstein
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.637

9.  Ethnic disparity in mortality after diagnosis of colorectal cancer among inner city minority New Yorkers.

Authors:  Balavenkatesh Kanna; Tarun K Narang; Tegpal Atwal; Doru Paul; Sulaiman Azeez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea.

Authors:  Yong Woo Chung; Dong Soo Han; Kwang Hyuk Park; Kyoung Oh Kim; Cheol Hee Park; Taeho Hahn; Kyo-Sang Yoo; Sang Hoon Park; Jong Hyeok Kim; Choong Kee Park
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

View more
  2 in total

1.  Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ryan E Childers; J Lucas Williams; Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Risk of colorectal adenomas and advanced neoplasia in Hispanic, black and white patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  B Lebwohl; K Capiak; A I Neugut; F Kastrinos
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 8.171

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.