B Lebwohl1, K Capiak, A I Neugut, F Kastrinos. 1. Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic differences in the risk of premalignant colorectal neoplasia have not been extensively studied. AIM: To measure adenoma prevalence among asymptomatic white, black and Hispanic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. METHODS: In this cross sectional cohort study, data from individuals ≥50 years undergoing first-time colonoscopy since 2006 at a single tertiary-care medical centre were obtained from the electronic medical record. Adenoma prevalence among whites, blacks and Hispanics was calculated; multivariate Poisson and logistic regression were used to identify factors independently associated with adenoma rates and the presence of advanced adenomas. RESULTS: We identified 5075 eligible subjects: 3542 (70%) whites, 942 (18%) Hispanics and 591 (12%) blacks. The mean age was 62.2 years with 58% women. At least one adenoma was detected in 19%, 22% and 26% of whites, Hispanics and blacks respectively (Hispanics vs. whites P = 0.09; blacks vs. whites P = 0.0001). Isolated proximal adenomas were present in 9% of whites, 11% of Hispanics (P = 0.03) and 11% of blacks (P = 0.03). In multivariate analyses, a higher rate of adenomas was present in Hispanics (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.20-1.57) and blacks (RR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.52-2.04) than whites. Hispanics and blacks also had an increased risk of advanced adenomas compared to whites (OR(Hispanics) : 2.25, 95% CI: 1.62-3.11; OR(blacks) : 1.91, 95% CI: 1.27-2.86). CONCLUSIONS: Adenoma prevalence was higher in blacks and Hispanics than in whites. Both groups were at greater risk of having proximal adenomas in the absence of any distal pathology than whites, where these lesions would have only been detected by colonoscopy. Efforts to promote screening are necessary among diverse, under-represented populations.
BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic differences in the risk of premalignant colorectal neoplasia have not been extensively studied. AIM: To measure adenoma prevalence among asymptomatic white, black and Hispanic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. METHODS: In this cross sectional cohort study, data from individuals ≥50 years undergoing first-time colonoscopy since 2006 at a single tertiary-care medical centre were obtained from the electronic medical record. Adenoma prevalence among whites, blacks and Hispanics was calculated; multivariate Poisson and logistic regression were used to identify factors independently associated with adenoma rates and the presence of advanced adenomas. RESULTS: We identified 5075 eligible subjects: 3542 (70%) whites, 942 (18%) Hispanics and 591 (12%) blacks. The mean age was 62.2 years with 58% women. At least one adenoma was detected in 19%, 22% and 26% of whites, Hispanics and blacks respectively (Hispanics vs. whites P = 0.09; blacks vs. whites P = 0.0001). Isolated proximal adenomas were present in 9% of whites, 11% of Hispanics (P = 0.03) and 11% of blacks (P = 0.03). In multivariate analyses, a higher rate of adenomas was present in Hispanics (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.20-1.57) and blacks (RR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.52-2.04) than whites. Hispanics and blacks also had an increased risk of advanced adenomas compared to whites (OR(Hispanics) : 2.25, 95% CI: 1.62-3.11; OR(blacks) : 1.91, 95% CI: 1.27-2.86). CONCLUSIONS:Adenoma prevalence was higher in blacks and Hispanics than in whites. Both groups were at greater risk of having proximal adenomas in the absence of any distal pathology than whites, where these lesions would have only been detected by colonoscopy. Efforts to promote screening are necessary among diverse, under-represented populations.
Authors: Paulo S Pinheiro; Melanie Williams; Eric A Miller; Stephanie Easterday; Sheniz Moonie; Edward J Trapido Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-01-29 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Benjamin Lebwohl; Alfred I Neugut; Eliezer Stavsky; Sonia Villegas; Corinne Meli; Orlando Rodriguez; Carmen Franco; Marian S Krauskopf; Richard Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2011 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: C Hassan; P J Pickhardt; D H Kim; E Di Giulio; A Zullo; A Laghi; A Repici; F Iafrate; J Osborn; B Annibale Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Paulo S Pinheiro; Recinda L Sherman; Edward J Trapido; Lora E Fleming; Youjie Huang; Orlando Gomez-Marin; David Lee Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: David A Lieberman; Jennifer L Holub; Matthew D Moravec; Glenn M Eisen; Dawn Peters; Cynthia D Morris Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Grace Clarke Hillyer; Benjamin Lebwohl; Richard M Rosenberg; Alfred I Neugut; Randi Wolf; Corey H Basch; Jennie Mata; Edwin Hernandez; Douglas A Corley; Steven Shea; Charles E Basch Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 4.409
Authors: Muneer J Al-Husseini; Anas M Saad; Khalid A Jazieh; Abdelmagid M Elmatboly; Ahmad Rachid; Mohamed M Gad; Inas A Ruhban; Talal Hilal Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Kristin Wallace; Allan DeToma; David N Lewin; Shaoli Sun; Don Rockey; Carolyn D Britten; Jennifer D Wu; Aissatou Ba; Anthony J Alberg; Elizabeth G Hill Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Ateev Mehrotra; Michele Morris; Rebecca A Gourevitch; David S Carrell; Daniel A Leffler; Sherri Rose; Julia B Greer; Seth D Crockett; Andrew Baer; Robert E Schoen Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Kristin Wallace; Heather M Brandt; James D Bearden; Bridgette F Blankenship; Renay Caldwell; James Dunn; Patricia Hegedus; Brenda J Hoffman; Courtney H Marsh; William H Marsh; Cathy L Melvin; March E Seabrook; Ronald E Sterba; Mary Lou Stinson; Annie Thibault; Franklin G Berger; Anthony J Alberg Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Kristin Wallace; Carol A Burke; Dennis J Ahnen; Elizabeth L Barry; Robert S Bresalier; Fred Saibil; John A Baron Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 4.254