Literature DB >> 25851159

Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.

Ryan E Childers1, J Lucas Williams1, Amnon Sonnenberg1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sedative and analgesic medications have been used routinely for decades to provide patient comfort, reduce procedure time, and improve examination quality during colonoscopy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends of sedation during colonoscopy in the United States.
SETTING: Endoscopic data repository of U.S. gastroenterology practices (Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative, CORI database from 2000 until 2013). PATIENTS: The study population was made up of patients undergoing a total of 1,385,436 colonoscopies.
INTERVENTIONS: Colonoscopy without any intervention or with mucosal biopsy, polypectomy, various means of hemostasis, luminal dilation, stent placement, or ablation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Dose of midazolam, diazepam, fentanyl, meperidine, diphenhydramine, promethazine, and propofol used for sedation during colonoscopy.
RESULTS: During the past 14 years, midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol have become the most commonly used sedatives for colonoscopy. Except for benzodiazepines, which were dosed higher in women than men, equal doses of sedation were given to female and male patients. White patients were given higher doses than other ethnic groups undergoing sedation for colonoscopy. Except for histamine-1 receptor antagonists, all sedative medications were given at lower doses to patients with increasing age. The dose of sedatives was higher in colonoscopies associated with procedural interventions or of long duration. LIMITATIONS: Potential for incomplete or incorrect documentation in the database.
CONCLUSION: The findings reflect on colonoscopy practice in the United States during the last 14 years and provide an incentive for future research on how sex and ethnicity influence sedation practices. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851159      PMCID: PMC4540687          DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  50 in total

1.  Safety and efficacy of colonoscopy in the elderly: experience in an innercity community hospital serving African American and Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Abbasi J Akhtar; Manmeet S Padda
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention.

Authors:  Jamilia R Sly; Tiffany Edwards; Rachel C Shelton; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2012-10-19

3.  1989 A/S/G/E survey of endoscopic sedation and monitoring practices.

Authors:  E B Keeffe; K W O'Connor
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Factors explaining racial/ethnic disparities in rates of physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Nasar U Ahmed; Valerie Pelletier; Kelly Winter; Ahmed N Albatineh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Efficacy of low and standard midazolam doses for gastroscopy. A randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  R Campo; E Brullet; A Montserrat; X Calvet; L Donoso; J M Bordas
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  Colorectal cancer in African Americans.

Authors:  Sangeeta Agrawal; Anand Bhupinderjit; Manoop S Bhutani; Lisa Boardman; Cuong Nguyen; Yvonne Romero; Radhika Srinivasan; Radhika Srinvasan; Colmar Figueroa-Moseley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Postoperative pain assessment and analgesic administration in Native American patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lee; Mary Teeple; Naina Bagrodia; Jack Hannallah; Nazhone P Yazzie; William J Adamas-Rappaport
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a colonoscopy screening navigator program designed for Hispanic men.

Authors:  Fernando A Wilson; Roberto Villarreal; Jim P Stimpson; José A Pagán
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  A national study of racial differences in pain screening rates in the VA health care system.

Authors:  Diana J Burgess; Amy A Gravely; David B Nelson; Michelle van Ryn; Matthew J Bair; Robert D Kerns; Diana M Higgins; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  J B Arrowsmith; B B Gerstman; D E Fleischer; S B Benjamin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  10 in total

1.  Sedation in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-05

2.  Autonomous Retroflexion of a Magnetic Flexible Endoscope.

Authors:  Piotr R Slawinski; Addisu Z Taddese; Kyle B Musto; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2017-02-13

3.  Does deep sedation with propofol affect adenoma detection rates in average risk screening colonoscopy exams?

Authors:  Selvi Thirumurthi; Gottumukkala S Raju; Mala Pande; Joseph Ruiz; Richard Carlson; Katherine B Hagan; Jeffrey H Lee; William A Ross
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-04-16

4.  How to improve patient satisfaction during midazolam sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy?

Authors:  Eun Hyo Jin; Kyoung Sup Hong; Young Lee; Ji Yeon Seo; Ji Min Choi; Jaeyoung Chun; Sang Gyun Kim; Joo Sung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Sedation for routine gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review on efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction.

Authors:  Otto S Lin
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2017-10-23

6.  Providers' Perceptions of Barriers to Optimal Communication With Patients During the Postcolonoscopy Experience.

Authors:  Travis Hyams; Barbara Curbow; Juliette Christie; Nora Mueller; Evelyn King-Marshall; Shahnaz Sultan; Thomas J George
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2018-03-23

7.  Comparison of Fentanyl versus Meperidine in Combination with Midazolam for Sedative Colonoscopy in Korea.

Authors:  Gwan Woo Hong; Jun Kyu Lee; Jung Hyeon Lee; Ji Hun Bong; Sung Hun Choi; Hyeki Cho; Ji Hyung Nam; Dong Kee Jang; Hyoun Woo Kang; Jae Hak Kim; Yun Jeong Lim; Moon Soo Koh; Jin Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2020-07-03

8.  Sedative effect of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in colonoscopic polypectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Yueyang Xin; Tiantian Chu; Jinxu Wang; Aijun Xu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.376

9.  Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial.

Authors:  Junxiang Li; Xiao Wang; Jin Liu; Xia Wang; Xiangkui Li; Yaping Wang; Wen Ouyang; Jun Li; Shanglong Yao; Zhaoqiong Zhu; Qulian Guo; Yonghao Yu; Jinhai Meng; Yunxia Zuo
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 10.  Pre-procedural Preparation and Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease.

Authors:  Brian M Fung; Deanna J Leon; Lauren N Beck; James H Tabibian
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.487

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.