Literature DB >> 20634646

Low acceptance of treatment in the elderly for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fracture in the acute rehabilitation setting.

Sarah D Berry1, Devyani Misra, Marian T Hannan, Douglas P Kiel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Given the high risk of subsequent fracture among elderly persons with fracture, it is important to initiate secondary treatment for osteoporosis. Acute rehabilitation centers may offer a unique opportunity to introduce treatment. Therefore, we evaluated willingness-to-participate and compliance with evidence-based interventions for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fracture in a non-randomized study conducted in the acute rehabilitation setting. We also described differences in baseline characteristics between study participants and non-participants.
METHODS: All consecutive, community dwelling admissions to an acute rehabilitation unit (Boston, MA) with the diagnosis of fracture were screened for enrollment. Eligible subjects were offered a free, 6-month supply of alendronate/cholecalciferol (70 mg/2800 IU weekly), calcium and vitamin D supplements, and fall prevention strategies. Six-month compliance (> or =75% consumption of medication or supplement) with the interventions was determined at a home visit.
RESULTS: Among 62 eligible subjects, 25 agreed to participate. Non-participants were older than participants (86 vs 80 yrs, p<0.01). There was no significant difference between other characteristics of participants and non-participants including sex, weight, type of fracture, cognitive status, and functional status. The most common reason for non-participation was reluctance to take another medication. Among participants, only 52% were compliant with alendronate and 58% were compliant with calcium and vitamin D supplementation at 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Willingness- to-participate and compliance with secondary prevention strategies for osteoporosis was low in the acute rehabilitation setting, even when medications were provided free of cost. Educating individuals with fracture and their families on the consequences and treatment of osteoporosis may help to decrease the risk of sustaining a second fracture by accepting secondary preventive measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20634646      PMCID: PMC2919059          DOI: 10.1007/bf03324801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  22 in total

1.  Exercise adherence following physical therapy intervention in older adults with impaired balance.

Authors:  Rebecca Forkan; Breeanna Pumper; Nicole Smyth; Hilary Wirkkala; Marcia A Ciol; Anne Shumway-Cook
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-03

2.  Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Barbara Gulanski; Dick Wittink
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-10-15

3.  Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Center; Dana Bliuc; Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Short time-frame from first to second hip fracture in the Funen County Hip Fracture Study.

Authors:  T Nymark; J M Lauritsen; O Ovesen; N D Röck; B Jeune
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis.

Authors:  C M Klotzbuecher; P D Ross; P B Landsman; T A Abbott; M Berger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. A prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Robert H Brophy; Demetris Demetrakopoulos; Jason Koob; Richard Hong; Adam Rana; Julie T Lin; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Treatment preference for monthly oral ibandronate and weekly oral alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A randomized, crossover study (BALTO II).

Authors:  Peyman Hadji; Helmut Minne; Michael Pfeifer; Pierre Bourgeois; Patrice Fardellone; Angelo Licata; Vipul Devas; Daiva Masanauskaite; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Improving the prediction of medication compliance: the example of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Juan Xi; Andrew O Westfall; Hong Cheng; Kenneth Lyles; Kenneth G Saag; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Risedronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  G Wells; A Cranney; J Peterson; M Boucher; B Shea; V Robinson; D Coyle; P Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

10.  Do patients perceive a link between a fragility fracture and osteoporosis?

Authors:  Lora Giangregorio; Alexandra Papaioannou; Lehana Thabane; Justin DeBeer; Ann Cranney; Lisa Dolovich; Anthony Adili; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  8 in total

1.  Two-year adherence to treatment and associated factors in a fracture liaison service in Spain.

Authors:  A Naranjo; S Ojeda-Bruno; A Bilbao-Cantarero; J C Quevedo-Abeledo; B V Diaz-González; C Rodríguez-Lozano
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  [The Ludwigshafen Osteoporosis Screening Questionnaire (LOS Questionnaire): result of the evaluation of anamnestic risk factors in osteoporosis diagnostics].

Authors:  C Wölfl; C Takur; A A Moghaddam; G Zimmermann; M Hitzler; H Schmidt-Gayk; B Höner; P A Grützner; L Kolios
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Patient education in osteoporosis prevention: a systematic review focusing on methodological quality of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jana-Carina Morfeld; Vera Vennedey; Dirk Müller; Dawid Pieper; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Adherence to Calcium and Vitamin D supplementations: results from the ADVICE Survey.

Authors:  Francesco Conti; Prisco Piscitelli; Giovanni Italiano; Alessandro Parma; Maria Cristina Caffetti; Lorenzo Giolli; Gian Luca Di Tanna; Andrea Guazzini; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2012-12-20

5.  Anamnestic risk factor questionnaire as reliable diagnostic instrument for osteoporosis (reduced bone morphogenic density).

Authors:  Leila Kolios; Caner Takur; Arash Moghaddam; Mirjam Hitzler; Heinrich Schmidt-Gayk; Arnold J Suda; Bernd Höner; Paul A Grützner; Christoph Wölfl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Application of the health belief model and social cognitive theory for osteoporosis preventive nutritional behaviors in a sample of Iranian women.

Authors:  Ali Khani Jeihooni; Alireza Hidarnia; Mohammad Hossein Kaveh; Ebrahim Hajizadeh; Alireza Askari
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

7.  Level of Adherence to Prophylactic Osteoporosis Medication amongst Patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  A Emamifar; Rannveig Gildberg-Mortensen; S Andreas Just; N Lomborg; R Asmussen Andreasen; I M Jensen Hansen
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09-29

8.  Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Nan Min; Fei Wang; Qing-Yun Xue
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.