Literature DB >> 19194337

Improving the prediction of medication compliance: the example of bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.

Jeffrey R Curtis1, Juan Xi, Andrew O Westfall, Hong Cheng, Kenneth Lyles, Kenneth G Saag, Elizabeth Delzell.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Administrative claims data have a limited ability to identify persons with high compliance to oral bisphosphonates. We tested whether adding information on compliance with other drugs used to treat chronic, asymptomatic conditions would improve the predictive ability of administrative data to identify adherent individuals.
METHODS: Using data from a large, US healthcare organization, we identified new bisphosphonate users and their 1-year compliance to oral bisphosphonates, quantified by the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR). Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the relationship between high bisphosphonate compliance (MPR >or=80%) and patient demographics, comorbidities, and health services utilization. To these logistic regression models, we evaluated the incremental change in the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) after adding information regarding compliance with other drug classes. These included antihyperlipidemics (statins), antihypertensives, antidepressants, oral diabetes agents, and glaucoma medications. Results from the logistic regression models were evaluated in parallel using recursive partitioning trees with 10-fold cross-validation.
RESULTS: Among 101,038 new bisphosphonate users, administrative data identified numerous nonmedication factors (eg, age, gender, use of preventive services) significantly associated with high bisphosphonate compliance at 1 year. However, all these factors in aggregate had low discriminant ability to identify persons highly adherent with bisphosphonates (AUC = 0.62). For persons who were new users of >or=1 of the other asymptomatic condition drugs, MPR data on the other drugs substantially improved the prediction of high bisphosphonate compliance. The impact on prediction was largest for concomitant statin users (AUC = 0.70).
CONCLUSIONS: Information on compliance with drugs used to treat chronic asymptomatic conditions improves the prediction of compliance with oral bisphosphonates. This information may help identify persons who should receive targeted interventions to promote compliance to osteoporosis medications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19194337      PMCID: PMC2693955          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818afa1c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  27 in total

1.  An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Estimating medication persistency using administrative claims data.

Authors:  Rishi Sikka; Fang Xia; Ronald E Aubert
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Persistence with treatment for hypertension in actual practice.

Authors:  J J Caro; M Salas; J L Speckman; G Raggio; J D Jackson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-01-12       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Adherence to statin therapy and LDL cholesterol goal attainment by patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Parris; David B Lawrence; Lisa A Mohn; Laura B Long
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Variations in compliance among hypertensive patients by drug class: implications for health care costs.

Authors:  J A Rizzo; W R Simons
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Persistence with treatment in newly treated middle-aged patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  Sylvie Perreault; Diane Lamarre; Lucie Blais; Alice Dragomir; Djamal Berbiche; Lyne Lalonde; Claudine Laurier; François St-Maurice; Johanne Collin
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  The impact of monitoring on adherence and persistence with antiresorptive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jackie A Clowes; Nicola F A Peel; Richard Eastell
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence.

Authors:  D E Morisky; L W Green; D M Levine
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  39 in total

1.  Does medication adherence itself confer fracture protection? An investigation of the healthy adherer effect in observational data.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Huifeng Yun; Jeff L Lange; Robert Matthews; Pradeep Sharma; Kenneth G Saag; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Measuring and improving adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Andrea M Burden
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 3.  Healthy user and related biases in observational studies of preventive interventions: a primer for physicians.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Amanda R Patrick; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Observing versus Predicting: Initial Patterns of Filling Predict Long-Term Adherence More Accurately Than High-Dimensional Modeling Techniques.

Authors:  Jessica M Franklin; William H Shrank; Joyce Lii; Alexis K Krumme; Olga S Matlin; Troyen A Brennan; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Commentary: measuring quality of care in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Silverman; Jeffrey Curtis
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Predicting persistence to antidepressant treatment in administrative claims data: Considering the influence of refill delays and prior persistence on other medications.

Authors:  Greta A Bushnell; Til Stürmer; Alice White; Virginia Pate; Sonja A Swanson; Deborah Azrael; Matthew Miller
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Fractures and mortality in relation to different osteoporosis treatments.

Authors:  Huifeng Yun; Elizabeth Delzell; Kenneth G Saag; Meredith L Kilgore; Michael A Morrisey; Paul Muntner; Robert Matthews; Lingli Guo; Nicole Wright; Wilson Smith; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Christopher M O'Connor; Kenneth W Lyles; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Decisions in the Psychology of Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Gérard Reach
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-14

9.  Cost-related nonadherence by medication type among Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes.

Authors:  Jessica Williams; William N Steers; Susan L Ettner; Carol M Mangione; Obidiugwu K Duru
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The non-interventional BonViva Intravenous Versus Alendronate (VIVA) study: real-world adherence and persistence to medication, efficacy, and safety, in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Hadji; D Felsenberg; M Amling; L C Hofbauer; J A Kandenwein; A Kurth
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.