Literature DB >> 17244835

Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women.

Jacqueline R Center1, Dana Bliuc, Tuan V Nguyen, John A Eisman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: There are few published long-term data on absolute risk of subsequent fracture (refracture) following initial low-trauma fracture in women and fewer in men.
OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term risk of subsequent fracture following initial osteoporotic fracture in men and women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study (Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study) in Australia of 2245 community-dwelling women and 1760 men aged 60 years or older followed up for 16 years from July 1989 through April 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of first (initial) fracture and incidence of subsequent fracture according to sex, age group, and time since first fracture. Relative risk was determined by comparing risk of subsequent fracture with risk of initial fracture.
RESULTS: There were 905 women and 337 men with an initial fracture, of whom 253 women and 71 men experienced a subsequent fracture. Relative risk (RR) of subsequent fracture in women was 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.70-2.25) and in men was 3.47 (95% CI, 2.68-4.48). As a result, absolute risk of subsequent fracture was similar in women and men and at least as great as the initial fracture risk for a woman 10 years older. Thus, women and men aged 60 to 69 years had absolute refracture rates of 36/1000 person-years (95% CI, 26-48/1000) and 37/1000 person-years (95% CI, 23-59/1000), respectively. The increase in absolute fracture risk remained for up to 10 years, by which time 40% to 60% of surviving women and men experienced a subsequent fracture. All fracture locations apart from rib (men) and ankle (women) resulted in increased subsequent fracture risk, with highest RRs following hip (RR, 9.97; 95% CI, 1.38-71.98) and clinical vertebral (RR, 15.12; 95% CI, 6.06-37.69) fractures in younger men. In multivariate analyses, femoral neck bone mineral density, age, and smoking were predictors of subsequent fracture in women and femoral neck bone mineral density, physical activity, and calcium intake were predictors in men.
CONCLUSION: After an initial low-trauma fracture, absolute risk of subsequent fracture was similar for men and women. This increased risk occurred for virtually all clinical fractures and persisted for up to 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17244835     DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.4.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  204 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Saito; J M Sterbenz; S Malay; L Zhong; M P MacEachern; K C Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Cost-effectiveness of the Concord Minimal Trauma Fracture Liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study.

Authors:  M S Cooper; A J Palmer; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The Fracture Liaison Service to close the osteoporosis care gap: a leadership educational model for undergraduate and postgraduate trainees.

Authors:  Micah Yu; Christina Downey; Karina D Torralba
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision.

Authors:  J H E Yong; L Masucci; J S Hoch; R Sujic; D Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Current Status of Bone-Forming Therapies for the Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Koldkjær Sølling; Torben Harsløf; Bente Langdahl
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Fracture liaison services: do they reduce fracture rates?

Authors:  Irma J A de Bruin; Caroline E Wyers; Joop P W van den Bergh; Piet P M M Geusens
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 8.  Genetic profiling and individualized assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 43.330

9.  Prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures in old men and the agreement between different methods in the city of Recife, Brazil.

Authors:  Carla Nubia Borges; Juliana Maia de Almeida; Denise Lima; Marcelo Cabral; Francisco Bandeira
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 10.  Osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin; Eric Orwoll
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.