Literature DB >> 15634808

Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. A prospective, randomized trial.

Michael J Gardner1, Robert H Brophy, Demetris Demetrakopoulos, Jason Koob, Richard Hong, Adam Rana, Julie T Lin, Joseph M Lane.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of osteoporosis following a hip fracture has been notoriously poor. Many efforts have been made to improve treatment rates. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a perioperative inpatient intervention program, involving patient education and providing a list of questions for the primary care physician, increased the percentage of patients in whom osteoporosis was addressed following a hip fracture.
METHODS: A prospective, randomized trial involving eighty patients who had been admitted to an academic medical center with a low-energy hip fracture was conducted. During their hospitalization, the study group patients were engaged in a fifteen-minute discussion regarding the association between osteoporosis and hip fractures, the efficacy of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and of bisphosphonates in its treatment, and the importance of medical follow-up for osteoporosis management. These patients were also provided with five questions regarding osteoporosis treatment to be given to their primary medical physician, and they were reminded about the questions during a follow-up telephone call six weeks later. The patients in the control group received a brochure describing methods for preventing falls. Both groups were contacted by telephone at six months after discharge to determine whether osteoporosis had been addressed. Positive indicators of intervention included assessment of bone mineral density with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and initiation of antiresorptive therapy.
RESULTS: The average age in each group was eighty-two years, and 78% of the patients were female. Four patients in each group did not survive through the six-month follow-up period and were excluded from the trial. Fifteen (42%) of the thirty-six patients who had been randomized to the study group, compared with only seven (19%) of the thirty-six patients in the control group, had their osteoporosis addressed by their primary physician. This difference between the groups was significant (p = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were provided with information and questions for their primary care physician about osteoporosis were more likely to receive appropriate therapeutic intervention than were patients who had not received the information and questions. Orthopaedic surgeons have a unique opportunity to improve the rate of osteoporosis treatment in the perioperative period following a hip fracture by educating patients and directing them toward channels for long-term osteoporosis management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15634808     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  74 in total

1.  Medical management in the acute hip fracture patient: a comprehensive review for the internist.

Authors:  Laura Bateman; Srinivas Vuppala; Patricia Porada; William Carter; Charitraheen Baijnath; Kabeer Burman; Ryan Lee; Jodie Hargus
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2012

2.  Fully informed consent is impossible in surgical clinical trials.

Authors:  Mark Bernstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  A randomized controlled trial of mailed osteoporosis education to older adults.

Authors:  D H Solomon; J S Finkelstein; J M Polinski; M Arnold; A Licari; D Cabral; C Canning; J Avorn; J N Katz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Randomized trial to improve fracture prevention in nursing home residents.

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Kenneth W Lyles; Paul House; Deborah A Levine; Anna P Schenck; Jeroan Allison; Joel Gorospe; Mary Fermazin; Kristi Oliver; Jeffrey R Curtis; Norman Weissman; Aiyuan Xie; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  A simple protocol for preventing falls and fractures in elderly individuals with musculoskeletal disease.

Authors:  K Kita; K Hujino; T Nasu; K Kawahara; Y Sunami
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?

Authors:  Gim Gee Teng; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Initiation of osteoporosis assessment in the fracture clinic results in improved osteoporosis management: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J M Queally; C Kiernan; M Shaikh; F Rowan; D Bennett
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Little; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Evaluation of a Multimodal, Direct-to-Patient Educational Intervention Targeting Barriers to Osteoporosis Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maria I Danila; Ryan C Outman; Elizabeth J Rahn; Amy S Mudano; David T Redden; Peng Li; Jeroan J Allison; Fred A Anderson; Allison Wyman; Susan L Greenspan; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jeri W Nieves; Stuart L Silverman; Ethel S Siris; Nelson B Watts; Michael J Miller; Jeffrey R Curtis; Amy H Warriner; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Brigham fracture intervention team initiatives for hospital patients with hip fractures: a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Julie Glowacki; Mitchel B Harris; Josef Simon; John Wright; Nikheel S Kolatkar; Thomas S Thornhill; Meryl S Leboff
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.257

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.