Literature DB >> 20632566

Validation of an algorithm for the nonrigid registration of longitudinal breast MR images using realistic phantoms.

Xia Li1, Benoit M Dawant, E Brian Welch, A Bapsi Chakravarthy, Lei Xu, Ingrid Mayer, Mark Kelley, Ingrid Meszoely, Julie Means-Powell, John C Gore, Thomas E Yankeelov.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors present a method to validate coregistration of breast magnetic resonance images obtained at multiple time points during the course of treatment. In performing sequential registration of breast images, the effects of patient repositioning, as well as possible changes in tumor shape and volume, must be considered. The authors accomplish this by extending the adaptive bases algorithm (ABA) to include a tumor-volume preserving constraint in the cost function. In this study, the authors evaluate this approach using a novel validation method that simulates not only the bulk deformation associated with breast MR images obtained at different time points, but also the reduction in tumor volume typically observed as a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: For each of the six patients, high-resolution 3D contrast enhanced T1-weighted images were obtained before treatment, after one cycle of chemotherapy and at the conclusion of chemotherapy. To evaluate the effects of decreasing tumor size during the course of therapy, simulations were run in which the tumor in the original images was contracted by 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95%, respectively. The contracted area was then filled using texture from local healthy appearing tissue. Next, to simulate the post-treatment data, the simulated (i.e., contracted tumor) images were coregistered to the experimentally measured post-treatment images using a surface registration. By comparing the deformations generated by the constrained and unconstrained version of ABA, the authors assessed the accuracy of the registration algorithms. The authors also applied the two algorithms on experimental data to study the tumor volume changes, the value of the constraint, and the smoothness of transformations.
RESULTS: For the six patient data sets, the average voxel shift error (mean +/- standard deviation) for the ABA with constraint was 0.45 +/- 0.37, 0.97 +/- 0.83, 1.43 +/- 0.96, and 1.80 +/- 1.17 mm for the 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% contraction simulations, respectively. In comparison, the average voxel shift error for the unconstrained ABA was 0.46 +/- 0.29, 1.13 +/- 1.17, 2.40 +/- 2.04, and 3.53 +/- 2.89 mm, respectively. These voxel shift errors translate into compression of the tumor volume: The ABA with constraint returned volumetric errors of 2.70 +/- 4.08%, 7.31 +/- 4.52%, 9.28 +/- 5.55%, and 13.19 +/- 6.73% for the 25%, 50%, 75%, and 95% contraction simulations, respectively, whereas the unconstrained ABA returned volumetric errors of 4.00 +/- 4.46%, 9.93 +/- 4.83%, 19.78 +/- 5.657%, and 29.75 +/- 15.18%. The ABA with constraint yields a smaller mean shift error, as well as a smaller volume error (p = 0.031 25 for the 75% and 95% contractions), than the unconstrained ABA for the simulated sets. Visual and quantitative assessments on experimental data also indicate a good performance of the proposed algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS: The ABA with constraint can successfully register breast MR images acquired at different time points with reasonable error. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of an attempt to quantitatively assess in both phantoms and a set of patients the accuracy of a registration algorithm for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632566      PMCID: PMC2881925          DOI: 10.1118/1.3414035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  Julia A Schnabel; Christine Tanner; Andy D Castellano-Smith; Andreas Degenhard; Martin O Leach; D Rodney Hose; Derek L G Hill; David J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  The adaptive bases algorithm for intensity-based nonrigid image registration.

Authors:  Gustavo K Rohde; Akram Aldroubi; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Calvin R Maurer; David A Bluemke; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Prospective comparison of mammography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer.

Authors:  Eren Yeh; Priscilla Slanetz; Daniel B Kopans; Elizabeth Rafferty; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Linda Moy; Elkan Halpern; Richard Moore; Irene Kuter; Alphonse Taghian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Semi-automated analysis for MRI of breast tumors.

Authors:  S C Partridge; E J Heumann; N M Hylton
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1999

8.  Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis and Bcl-2 levels correlate with breast cancer response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas A Buchholz; Darren W Davis; David J McConkey; W Fraser Symmans; Vicente Valero; Anuja Jhingran; Susan L Tucker; Lajos Pusztai; Massimo Cristofanilli; Francisco J Esteva; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Aysegul A Sahin
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

9.  A prospective randomized pilot study to evaluate predictors of response in serial core biopsies to single agent neoadjuvant doxorubicin or paclitaxel for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Vered Stearns; Baljit Singh; Theodore Tsangaris; Jeanette G Crawford; Antonella Novielli; Mathew J Ellis; Claudine Isaacs; Marie Pennanen; Cecilia Tibery; Ahmad Farhad; Rebecca Slack; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  A nonrigid registration algorithm for longitudinal breast MR images and the analysis of breast tumor response.

Authors:  Xia Li; Benoit M Dawant; E Brian Welch; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Darla Freehardt; Ingrid Mayer; Mark Kelley; Ingrid Meszoely; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  15 in total

1.  Integration of diffusion-weighted MRI data and a simple mathematical model to predict breast tumor cellularity during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nkiruka C Atuegwu; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; E Brian Welch; Bapsi A Chakravarthy; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Three-dimensional Image-based Mechanical Modeling for Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.756

3.  Comparative evaluation of registration algorithms in different brain databases with varying difficulty: results and insights.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Hamed Akbari; Michel Bilello; Xiao Da; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Longitudinal, intermodality registration of quantitative breast PET and MRI data acquired before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Nkiruka C Atuegwu; Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; Jason M Williams; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Combining multiparametric MRI with receptor information to optimize prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Hakmook Kang; Allison Hainline; Lori R Arlinghaus; Stephanie Elderidge; Xia Li; Vandana G Abramson; Anuradha Bapsi Chakravarthy; Richard G Abramson; Brian Bingham; Kareem Fakhoury; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-12-29

6.  Analyzing Spatial Heterogeneity in DCE- and DW-MRI Parametric Maps to Optimize Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Xia Li; Hakmook Kang; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana G Abramson; Jaime Farley; Melinda Sanders; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Current and future trends in magnetic resonance imaging assessments of the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Mia Levy; David Smith; E Brian Welch; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 8.  Diffusion MRI in early cancer therapeutic response assessment.

Authors:  C J Galbán; B A Hoff; T L Chenevert; B D Ross
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  A mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model for predicting the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana Abramson; Jaime Farley; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  DCE-MRI analysis methods for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pilot study findings.

Authors:  Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Gregory D Ayers; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Richard G Abramson; Vandana G Abramson; Nkiruka Atuegwu; Jaime Farley; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie Means-Powell; Ana M Grau; Melinda Sanders; Sandeep R Bhave; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.