PURPOSE: The relevance of apoptosis to breast cancer response to chemotherapy is unclear. We investigated whether changes in tumor cell apoptosis and Bcl-2 expression immediately after chemotherapy correlated with response to breast cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial core biopsies of 25 breast cancer primary tumors were performed at either two or three time points: before treatment (N = 24) and approximately 24 hours (N = 22) and/or 48 hours (N = 19) after the initiation of the first cycle of chemotherapy. Apoptosis levels were quantified by use of a fluorescent terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end-labeling (TUNEL) stain, and Bcl-2 and Bax were measured by semiquantitative immunohistochemical assays. All calculated P values were two sided. RESULTS: The apoptosis level at 48 hours was significantly higher in the tumors with pathological complete response or < 1 cm of residual disease (median, 22%; range, 6%-51%) than in the tumors with > 1 cm residual disease (median, 7%; range, 1%-36%); Mann-Whitney test. This difference was also present in the subgroup of 16 tumors treated with docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy (25% vs 4%, respectively). A decrease in Bcl2 expression after chemotherapy relative to the expression from the pretreatment sample also correlated with disease response. Specifically, three of the nine tumors with a decrease in Bcl-2 had a pathological complete response, compared with 0 of the 15 tumors with stable levels of Bcl-2 (Fisher's exact test). There was no relationship between serial measurements of Bax and response. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that apoptosis may play an important role in determining breast cancer response to chemotherapy and that the level of treatment-induced apoptosis may have some value as a predictive marker.
PURPOSE: The relevance of apoptosis to breast cancer response to chemotherapy is unclear. We investigated whether changes in tumor cell apoptosis and Bcl-2 expression immediately after chemotherapy correlated with response to breast cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial core biopsies of 25 breast cancer primary tumors were performed at either two or three time points: before treatment (N = 24) and approximately 24 hours (N = 22) and/or 48 hours (N = 19) after the initiation of the first cycle of chemotherapy. Apoptosis levels were quantified by use of a fluorescent terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end-labeling (TUNEL) stain, and Bcl-2 and Bax were measured by semiquantitative immunohistochemical assays. All calculated P values were two sided. RESULTS: The apoptosis level at 48 hours was significantly higher in the tumors with pathological complete response or < 1 cm of residual disease (median, 22%; range, 6%-51%) than in the tumors with > 1 cm residual disease (median, 7%; range, 1%-36%); Mann-Whitney test. This difference was also present in the subgroup of 16 tumors treated with docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy (25% vs 4%, respectively). A decrease in Bcl2 expression after chemotherapy relative to the expression from the pretreatment sample also correlated with disease response. Specifically, three of the nine tumors with a decrease in Bcl-2 had a pathological complete response, compared with 0 of the 15 tumors with stable levels of Bcl-2 (Fisher's exact test). There was no relationship between serial measurements of Bax and response. DISCUSSION: These data suggest that apoptosis may play an important role in determining breast cancer response to chemotherapy and that the level of treatment-induced apoptosis may have some value as a predictive marker.
Authors: Thomas E Yankeelov; Martin Lepage; Anuradha Chakravarthy; Elizabeth E Broome; Kenneth J Niermann; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid Meszoely; Ingrid A Mayer; Cheryl R Herman; Kevin McManus; Ronald R Price; John C Gore Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Stacy L Moulder; W Fraser Symmans; Daniel J Booser; Timothy L Madden; Cindy Lipsanen; Linda Yuan; Abenaa M Brewster; Massimo Cristofanilli; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz; James Zwiebel; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Francisco J Esteva Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Y Waerzeggers; R T Ullrich; P Monfared; T Viel; M Weckesser; W Stummer; O Schober; A Winkeler; A H Jacobs Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Carsten Zwick; Gerhard Held; Vera Hammermeister; Adnan Alahmad; Boris Kubuschok; Joerg Bittenbring; Manfred Ahlgrimm; Frank Neumann; Klaus-Dieter Preuss; Michael Pfreundschuh Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; Mia Levy; David Smith; E Brian Welch; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: J Oncol Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.375
Authors: Durga N Tripathi; Rajdeep Chowdhury; Laura J Trudel; Andrew R Tee; Rebecca S Slack; Cheryl Lyn Walker; Gerald N Wogan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 11.205