Literature DB >> 12430949

Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance.

Graham J Hole1, Patricia A George, Karen Eaves, Ayman Rasek.   

Abstract

The importance of 'configural' processing for face recognition is now well established, but it remains unclear precisely what it entails. Through four experiments we attempted to clarify the nature of configural processing by investigating the effects of various affine transformations on the recognition of familiar faces. Experiment 1 showed that recognition was markedly impaired by inversion of faces, somewhat impaired by shearing or horizontally stretching them, but unaffected by vertical stretching of faces to twice their normal height. In experiment 2 we investigated vertical and horizontal stretching in more detail, and found no effects of either transformation. Two further experiments were performed to determine whether participants were recognising stretched faces by using configural information. Experiment 3 showed that nonglobal vertical stretching of faces (stretching either the top or the bottom half while leaving the remainder undistorted) impaired recognition, implying that configural information from the stretched part of the face was influencing the process of recognition--ie that configural processing involves global facial properties. In experiment 4 we examined the effects of Gaussian blurring on recognition of undistorted and vertically stretched faces. Faces remained recognisable even when they were both stretched and blurred, implying that participants were basing their judgments on configural information from these stimuli, rather than resorting to some strategy based on local featural details. The tolerance of spatial distortions in human face recognition suggests that the configural information used as a basis for face recognition is unlikely to involve information about the absolute position of facial features relative to each other, at least not in any simple way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12430949     DOI: 10.1068/p3252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  17 in total

1.  Forward masking of faces by spatially quantized random and structured masks: on the roles of wholistic configuration, local features, and spatial-frequency spectra in perceptual identification.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann; Iiris Luiga; Endel Põder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-24

2.  Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.

Authors:  Marlena L Itz; Stefan R Schweinberger; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The constancy of the holistic processing of unfamiliar faces: Evidence from the study-test consistency effect and the within-person motion and viewpoint invariance.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Xinge Liu; Xinran Feng; Guomei Zhou
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  The composite face illusion.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

5.  Discrimination and recognition of faces with changed configuration.

Authors:  Adam Sandford; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

6.  Visual configural processing in adults born at extremely low birth weight.

Authors:  Karen J Mathewson; Daphne Maurer; Catherine J Mondloch; Saroj Saigal; Ryan J Van Lieshout; Louis A Schmidt
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2019-08-27

7.  Global-local precedence in the perception of facial age and emotional expression by children with autism and other developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Thomas F Gross
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2005-12

8.  Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Selectivity of face distortion aftereffects for differences in expression or gender.

Authors:  Megan A Tillman; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-01-30

10.  Stimulus requirements for face perception: an analysis based on "totem poles".

Authors:  Carrie L Paras; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.