Literature DB >> 20631209

Basing perceptual decisions on the most informative sensory neurons.

Miranda Scolari1, John T Serences.   

Abstract

Single unit recording studies show that perceptual decisions are often based on the output of sensory neurons that are maximally responsive (or "tuned") to relevant stimulus features. However, when performing a difficult discrimination between two highly similar stimuli, perceptual decisions should instead be based on the activity of neurons tuned away from the relevant feature (off-channel neurons) as these neurons undergo a larger firing rate change and are thus more informative. To test this hypothesis, we measured feature-selective responses in human primary visual cortex (V1) using functional magnetic resonance imaging and show that the degree of off-channel activation predicts performance on a difficult visual discrimination task. Moreover, this predictive relationship between off-channel activation and perceptual acuity is not simply the result of extensive practice with a specific stimulus feature (as in studies of perceptual learning). Instead, relying on the output of the most informative sensory neurons may represent a general, and optimal, strategy for efficiently computing perceptual decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20631209      PMCID: PMC2957467          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00273.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  64 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting.

Authors:  J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Orientation bandwidth: the effect of spatial and temporal frequency.

Authors:  R J Snowden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain.

Authors:  H R Heekeren; S Marrett; P A Bandettini; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Sean M Polyn; Greg J Detre; James V Haxby
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Estimating the influence of attention on population codes in human visual cortex using voxel-based tuning functions.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo; Miranda Scolari; Tiffany Ho; L Tugan Muftuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Thomas Naselaris; Ryan J Prenger; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  24 in total

1.  Optimal deployment of attentional gain during fine discriminations.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; Anna Byers; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Decoding working memory of stimulus contrast in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Yue Xing; Tim Ledgeway; Paul V McGraw; Denis Schluppeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatial Tuning Shifts Increase the Discriminability and Fidelity of Population Codes in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Vy A Vo; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  A review of the mechanisms by which attentional feedback shapes visual selectivity.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Janneke F M Jehee; Franco Pestilli
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Attention improves perceptual quality.

Authors:  Britt Anderson; Michael Druker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

6.  Individual differences in attention strategies during detection, fine discrimination, and coarse discrimination.

Authors:  David A Bridwell; Elizabeth A Hecker; John T Serences; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Decoding patterns of human brain activity.

Authors:  Frank Tong; Michael S Pratte
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 8.  Visual attention mitigates information loss in small- and large-scale neural codes.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sameer Saproo; John T Serences
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Clayton E Curtis; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Neural responses to target features outside a search array are enhanced during conjunction but not unique-feature search.

Authors:  David R Painter; Paul E Dux; Susan L Travis; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.