Literature DB >> 18322462

Identifying natural images from human brain activity.

Kendrick N Kay1, Thomas Naselaris, Ryan J Prenger, Jack L Gallant.   

Abstract

A challenging goal in neuroscience is to be able to read out, or decode, mental content from brain activity. Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have decoded orientation, position and object category from activity in visual cortex. However, these studies typically used relatively simple stimuli (for example, gratings) or images drawn from fixed categories (for example, faces, houses), and decoding was based on previous measurements of brain activity evoked by those same stimuli or categories. To overcome these limitations, here we develop a decoding method based on quantitative receptive-field models that characterize the relationship between visual stimuli and fMRI activity in early visual areas. These models describe the tuning of individual voxels for space, orientation and spatial frequency, and are estimated directly from responses evoked by natural images. We show that these receptive-field models make it possible to identify, from a large set of completely novel natural images, which specific image was seen by an observer. Identification is not a mere consequence of the retinotopic organization of visual areas; simpler receptive-field models that describe only spatial tuning yield much poorer identification performance. Our results suggest that it may soon be possible to reconstruct a picture of a person's visual experience from measurements of brain activity alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18322462      PMCID: PMC3556484          DOI: 10.1038/nature06713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  29 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal frequency and direction sensitivities of human visual areas measured using fMRI.

Authors:  K D Singh; A T Smith; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Estimating receptive field size from fMRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  A T Smith; K D Singh; A L Williams; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Natural image statistics and neural representation.

Authors:  E P Simoncelli; B A Olshausen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 4.  What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity?

Authors:  David J Heeger; David Ress
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  BOLD fMRI and psychophysical measurements of contrast response to broadband images.

Authors:  Cheryl A Olman; Kamil Ugurbil; Paul Schrater; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) "brain reading": detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex.

Authors:  David D Cox; Robert L Savoy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Responses of human visual cortex to uniform surfaces.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; R Beau Lotto; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Interpreting the BOLD signal.

Authors:  Nikos K Logothetis; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 19.318

9.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Serge O Dumoulin; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  344 in total

1.  Identifying fragments of natural speech from the listener's MEG signals.

Authors:  Miika Koskinen; Jaakko Viinikanoja; Mikko Kurimo; Arto Klami; Samuel Kaski; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Basing perceptual decisions on the most informative sensory neurons.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Local non-linear interactions in the visual cortex may reflect global decorrelation.

Authors:  Simo Vanni; Tom Rosenström
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Population response profiles in early visual cortex are biased in favor of more valuable stimuli.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Spatial attention improves the quality of population codes in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Sameer Saproo; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Within- and cross-participant classifiers reveal different neural coding of information.

Authors:  John A Clithero; David V Smith; R McKell Carter; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Automated classification of fMRI data employing trial-based imagery tasks.

Authors:  Jong-Hwan Lee; Matthew Marzelli; Ferenc A Jolesz; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 9.  Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: a tutorial overview.

Authors:  Francisco Pereira; Tom Mitchell; Matthew Botvinick
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Cortical correlates of human motion perception biases.

Authors:  Brett Vintch; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.