Literature DB >> 24990408

A review of the mechanisms by which attentional feedback shapes visual selectivity.

Sam Ling1, Janneke F M Jehee, Franco Pestilli.   

Abstract

The glut of information available for the brain to process at any given moment necessitates an efficient attentional system that can 'pick and choose' what information receives prioritized processing. A growing body of work, spanning numerous methodologies and species, reveals that one powerful way in which attending to an item separates the wheat from the chaff is by altering a basic response property in the brain: neuronal selectivity. Selectivity is a cornerstone response property, largely dictating our ability to represent and interact with the environment. Although it is likely that selectivity is altered throughout many brain areas, here we focus on how directing attention to an item affects selectivity in the visual system, where this response property is generally more well characterized. First, we review the neural architecture supporting selectivity, and then discuss the various changes that could occur in selectivity for an attended item. In a survey of the literature, spanning neurophysiology, neuroimaging and psychophysics, we reveal that there is general convergence regarding the manner with which selectivity is shaped by attentional feedback. In a nutshell, the literature suggests that the type of changes in selectivity that manifest appears to depend on the type of attention being deployed: whereas directing spatial attention towards an item only alters spatial selectivity, directing feature-based attention can alter the selectivity of attended features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24990408      PMCID: PMC4282837          DOI: 10.1007/s00429-014-0818-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Struct Funct        ISSN: 1863-2653            Impact factor:   3.270


  103 in total

1.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters.

Authors:  D K Lee; L Itti; C Koch; J Braun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Daniel H O'Connor; Miki M Fukui; Mark A Pinsk; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Kenneth C Roberts; Roy E Crist; Daniel H Weissman; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Estimating the influence of attention on population codes in human visual cortex using voxel-based tuning functions.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo; Miranda Scolari; Tiffany Ho; L Tugan Muftuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; Kristy A Sundberg; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Strength and orientation tuning of the thalamic input to simple cells revealed by electrically evoked cortical suppression.

Authors:  S Chung; D Ferster
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex.

Authors:  R Malach; J B Reppas; R R Benson; K K Kwong; H Jiang; W A Kennedy; P J Ledden; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Attention selects informative neural populations in human V1.

Authors:  Preeti Verghese; Yee-Joon Kim; Alex R Wade
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Melissa Saenz; Giedrius T Buracas; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  9 in total

1.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Inverted Encoding Models of Human Population Response Conflate Noise and Neural Tuning Width.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Dylan Cable; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  How exogenous spatial attention affects visual representation.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Hsin-Hung Li; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Orientation Probability and Spatial Exogenous Cuing Improve Perceptual Precision and Response Speed by Different Mechanisms.

Authors:  Syaheed B Jabar; Britt Anderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-08

8.  Competing rhythmic neural representations of orientations during concurrent attention to multiple orientation features.

Authors:  Ce Mo; Junshi Lu; Bichan Wu; Jianrong Jia; Huan Luo; Fang Fang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Juvenile depletion of microglia reduces orientation but not high spatial frequency selectivity in mouse V1.

Authors:  Dario X Figueroa Velez; Miguel Arreola; Carey Y L Huh; Kim Green; Sunil P Gandhi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.