Literature DB >> 28447310

Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.

Po-Hsien Huang1.   

Abstract

Model selection is a popular strategy in structural equation modeling (SEM). To select an "optimal" model, many selection criteria have been proposed. In this study, we derive the asymptotics of several popular selection procedures in SEM, including AIC, BIC, the RMSEA, and a two-stage rule for the RMSEA (RMSEA-2S). All of the results are derived under weak distributional assumptions and can be applied to a wide class of discrepancy functions. The results show that both AIC and BIC asymptotically select a model with the smallest population minimum discrepancy function (MDF) value regardless of nested or non-nested selection, but only BIC could consistently choose the most parsimonious one under nested model selection. When there are many non-nested models attaining the smallest MDF value, the consistency of BIC for the most parsimonious one fails. On the other hand, the RMSEA asymptotically selects a model that attains the smallest population RMSEA value, and the RESEA-2S chooses the most parsimonious model from all models with the population RMSEA smaller than the pre-specified cutoff. The empirical behavior of the considered criteria is also illustrated via four numerical examples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Akaike information criterion; Bayesian information criterion; model selection; root-mean-square error of approximation; structural equation modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28447310     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-017-9572-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  13 in total

Review 1.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.

Authors:  R C MacCallum; J T Austin
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt; In Jae Myung; Shaobo Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions.

Authors:  Corey L M Keyes; Dov Shmotkin; Carol D Ryff
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-06

4.  Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification.

Authors:  R Cudeck; S J Henly
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).

Authors:  Scott I Vrieze
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-02-06

6.  2001 Presidential Address: Working with Imperfect Models.

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Choosing the Optimal Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Model Selection Perspective.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Guangjian Zhang; Cheongtag Kim; Gerhard Mels
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations.

Authors:  Dennis L Jackson; J Arthur Gillaspy; Rebecca Purc-Stephenson
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-03

9.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  Model Selection Criteria for Missing-Data Problems Using the EM Algorithm.

Authors:  Joseph G Ibrahim; Hongtu Zhu; Niansheng Tang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

View more
  7 in total

1.  Sexual Minority Stressors and Intimate Partner Violence Among Same-Sex Couples: Commitment as a Resource.

Authors:  Xiaomin Li; Melissa A Curran; Emily Butler; W Roger Mills-Koonce; Hongjian Cao
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  Measurement invariance properties and external construct validity of the short Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale in a large national sample of secondary school students in Wales.

Authors:  G J Melendez-Torres; Gillian Hewitt; Britt Hallingberg; Rebecca Anthony; Stephan Collishaw; Jeremy Hall; Simon Murphy; Graham Moore
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  A five-long non-coding RNA signature with the ability to predict overall survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lizhong Zeng; Wei Wang; Yang Chen; Xin Lv; Jingyan Yuan; Ruiying Sun; Shuanying Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  The Malay version of the attitudes and beliefs about cardiovascular disease (ABCD-M) risk questionnaire: a translation, reliability and validation study.

Authors:  Zarudin Mat Said; Tengku Alina Tengku Ismail; Anees Abdul Hamid; Ramesh Sahathevan; Zariah Abdul Aziz; Kamarul Imran Musa
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.135

5.  Item Response Theory Analysis of the Dark Factor of Personality Scale for College Students in China.

Authors:  Xinyi Wang; Shiyi Zhang; Tao Xin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Depressive Symptoms, Alcohol Beliefs and Heavy Episodic Drinking in Adolescents.

Authors:  Robert J Wellman; Catherine M Sabiston; Matthis Morgenstern
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13

7.  Measurement invariance of the short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and latent mean differences (SWEMWBS) in young people by current care status.

Authors:  Rebecca Anthony; Graham Moore; Nicholas Page; Gillian Hewitt; Simon Murphy; G J Melendez-Torres
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.