Literature DB >> 28417228

A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling.

Po-Hsien Huang1,2, Hung Chen3, Li-Jen Weng4.   

Abstract

A penalized likelihood (PL) method for structural equation modeling (SEM) was proposed as a methodology for exploring the underlying relations among both observed and latent variables. Compared to the usual likelihood method, PL includes a penalty term to control the complexity of the hypothesized model. When the penalty level is appropriately chosen, the PL can yield an SEM model that balances the model goodness-of-fit and model complexity. In addition, the PL results in a sparse estimate that enhances the interpretability of the final model. The proposed method is especially useful when limited substantive knowledge is available for model specifications. The PL method can be also understood as a methodology that links the traditional SEM to the exploratory SEM (Asparouhov & Muthén in Struct Equ Model Multidiscipl J 16:397-438, 2009). An expectation-conditional maximization algorithm was developed to maximize the PL criterion. The asymptotic properties of the proposed PL were also derived. The performance of PL was evaluated through a numerical experiment, and two real data illustrations were presented to demonstrate its utility in psychological research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECM algorithm; factor analysis model; model selection; oracle property; penalized likelihood; structural equation modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28417228     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-017-9566-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  26 in total

1.  Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: a clarification.

Authors:  R Cudeck; S J Henly
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).

Authors:  Scott I Vrieze
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-02-06

3.  Cross-Validation Of Covariance Structures.

Authors:  R Cudeck; M W Browne
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  The Impact of Specification Error on the Estimation, Testing, and Improvement of Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  D Kaplan
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1988-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness.

Authors:  Ruth A Baer; Gregory T Smith; Jaclyn Hopkins; Jennifer Krietemeyer; Leslie Toney
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2006-03

6.  VARIABLE SELECTION IN LINEAR MIXED EFFECTS MODELS.

Authors:  Yingying Fan; Runze Li
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.028

7.  Regularization Parameter Selections via Generalized Information Criterion.

Authors:  Yiyun Zhang; Runze Li; Chih-Ling Tsai
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  COORDINATE DESCENT ALGORITHMS FOR NONCONVEX PENALIZED REGRESSION, WITH APPLICATIONS TO BIOLOGICAL FEATURE SELECTION.

Authors:  Patrick Breheny; Jian Huang
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Fixed and random effects selection in mixed effects models.

Authors:  Joseph G Ibrahim; Hongtu Zhu; Ramon I Garcia; Ruixin Guo
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  8 in total

1.  Path and Directionality Discovery in Individual Dynamic Models: A Regularized Unified Structural Equation Modeling Approach for Hybrid Vector Autoregression.

Authors:  Ai Ye; Kathleen M Gates; Teague Rhine Henry; Lan Luo
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  New Developments in Factor Score Regression: Fit Indices and a Model Comparison Test.

Authors:  Ines Devlieger; Wouter Talloen; Yves Rosseel
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Sparse and Simple Structure Estimation via Prenet Penalization.

Authors:  Kei Hirose; Yoshikazu Terada
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Fully and partially exploratory factor analysis with bi-level Bayesian regularization.

Authors:  Jinsong Chen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-07-12

5.  A Practical Guide to Variable Selection in Structural Equation Models with Regularized MIMIC Models.

Authors:  Ross Jacobucci; Andreas M Brandmaier; Rogier A Kievit
Journal:  Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-03-25

6.  Single- and Multiple-Group Penalized Factor Analysis: A Trust-Region Algorithm Approach with Integrated Automatic Multiple Tuning Parameter Selection.

Authors:  Elena Geminiani; Giampiero Marra; Irini Moustaki
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  The moderating effect of burnout on professionalism, values and competence of nurses in Saudi Arabia amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural equation modelling approach.

Authors:  Rizal Angelo N Grande; Daniel Joseph E Berdida; Hazel N Villagracia; Sage Mesias Raguindin; Larry Terrence O Cornejo; Nashi Masnad Al Reshidi; Ahmad Tuaysan Alshammari; Bander Jarallah Aljebari; Asmaa Mohammed Ali AlAbd
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.680

8.  Structural Equation Modeling With Many Variables: A Systematic Review of Issues and Developments.

Authors:  Lifang Deng; Miao Yang; Katerina M Marcoulides
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.