Literature DB >> 20623126

Dual energy CT (DECT) of the liver: conventional versus virtual unenhanced images.

Carlo Nicola De Cecco1, Vitaliano Buffa, Stefano Fedeli, Monica Luzietti, Andrea Vallone, Roberto Ruopoli, Vittorio Miele, Marco Rengo, Pasquale Paolantonio, Michelangelo Maurizi Enrici, Andrea Laghi, Vincenzo David.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare image quality and noise of conventional unenhanced (CU) and virtual unenhanced (VU) images in patients who underwent hepatic dual energy computed tomography (DECT) and to assess potential radiation dose reduction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients were studied. Mean CU and VU image quality and noise were analyzed by two blinded radiologists using a five-point grade scale. The effective radiation dose of a triple-phase protocol (CU, arterial and DE portal phases) were compared with that of a dual-phase protocol (arterial and DE portal phases).
RESULTS: No significant difference in mean image quality was observed between VU (3.92 ± 0.85) and CU images (4.20 ± 0.72). A significant difference in mean image noise was observed between VU and CU (P < 0.01). The dose reduction achieved by omitting the unenhanced acquisition was 30.47 ± 7.07% (P < 0.01). In 6 patients, a complete VU liver image was not obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: VU images can be obtained with similar image quality as CU. This approach favors a reduction in patient's radiation exposure. Nevertheless, a complete abdominal DECT is possible only in patients with a low body mass index, due technical limitations of the present DECT systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20623126     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1874-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Carl D Elliston
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen.

Authors:  Anno Graser; Thorsten R C Johnson; Hersh Chandarana; Michael Macari
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Kensuke Uotani; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Masahiro Higashi; Tetsuro Nakazawa; Atsushi K Kono; Yoshiro Hori; Tetsuya Fukuda; Suzu Kanzaki; Naoaki Yamada; Toshihide Itoh; Kazuro Sugimura; Hiroaki Naito
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique for characterization of renal masses as cyst or solid: a phantom feasibility study.

Authors:  C L Brown; R P Hartman; O P Dzyubak; N Takahashi; A Kawashima; C H McCollough; M R Bruesewitz; A M Primak; J G Fletcher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Abdominal aorta: evaluation with dual-source dual-energy multidetector CT after endovascular repair of aneurysms--initial observations.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Myrna C B Godoy; Ioannis Vlahos; Anno Graser; James Babb; Christianne Leidecker; Michael Macari
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: detection with dual-energy dual-source CT.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Thomas Frauenfelder; Thomas Pfammatter; Nicole Peter; Hans Scheffel; Mario Lachat; Bernhard Schmidt; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Thomas Schertler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of urinary stone disease.

Authors:  Hans Scheffel; Paul Stolzmann; Thomas Frauenfelder; Thomas Schertler; Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Dual-energy CT for the characterization of urinary calculi: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol.

Authors:  C Thomas; O Patschan; D Ketelsen; I Tsiflikas; A Reimann; H Brodoefel; M Buchgeister; U Nagele; A Stenzl; C Claussen; A Kopp; M Heuschmid; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Dual energy CT for the assessment of lung perfusion--correlation to scintigraphy.

Authors:  Sven F Thieme; Christoph R Becker; Marcus Hacker; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Thorsten R C Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Dual energy computed tomography in tophaceous gout.

Authors:  H K Choi; A M Al-Arfaj; A Eftekhari; P L Munk; K Shojania; G Reid; S Nicolaou
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Dual-energy computed tomography applications in uroradiology.

Authors:  Jong Park; Hersh Chandarana; Michael Macari; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Reducing the effects of metal artefact using high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT (DECT) in hip replacements.

Authors:  Mark Lewis; Karen Reid; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Virtual versus true non-contrast dual-energy CT imaging for the diagnosis of aortic intramural hematoma.

Authors:  Salim Si-Mohamed; Nicolas Dupuis; Valérie Tatard-Leitman; David Rotzinger; Sara Boccalini; Matthias Dion; Alain Vlassenbroek; Philippe Coulon; Yoad Yagil; Nadav Shapira; Philippe Douek; Loic Boussel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Impact of prior information on material decomposition in dual- and multienergy computed tomography.

Authors:  Liqiang Ren; Shengzhen Tao; Kishore Rajendran; Cynthia H McCollough; Lifeng Yu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-03-14

5.  Quantitative accuracy and dose efficiency of dual-contrast imaging using dual-energy CT: a phantom study.

Authors:  Liqiang Ren; Kishore Rajendran; Cynthia H McCollough; Lifeng Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Dual energy CT in clinical routine: how it works and how it adds value.

Authors:  Aaron D Sodickson; Abhishek Keraliya; Bryan Czakowski; Andrew Primak; Jeremy Wortman; Jennifer W Uyeda
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-06-01

7.  Dual-energy CT of the brain: Comparison between DECT angiography-derived virtual unenhanced images and true unenhanced images in the detection of intracranial haemorrhage.

Authors:  Matteo Bonatti; Fabio Lombardo; Giulia A Zamboni; Patrizia Pernter; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli; Giampietro Bonatti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Can single-phase dual-energy CT reliably identify adrenal adenomas?

Authors:  A Helck; N Hummel; F G Meinel; T Johnson; K Nikolaou; A Graser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Opportunities for new CT contrast agents to maximize the diagnostic potential of emerging spectral CT technologies.

Authors:  Benjamin M Yeh; Paul F FitzGerald; Peter M Edic; Jack W Lambert; Robert E Colborn; Michael E Marino; Paul M Evans; Jeannette C Roberts; Zhen J Wang; Margaret J Wong; Peter J Bonitatibus
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 15.470

10.  Role of dual energy spectral computed tomography in characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Initial experience from a tertiary liver care institute.

Authors:  S T Laroia; Ajeet Singh Bhadoria; Yamini Venigalla; G K Chibber; Chagan Bihari; Archana Rastogi; S K Sarin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2016-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.