Literature DB >> 19277672

Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Kensuke Uotani1, Yoshiyuki Watanabe, Masahiro Higashi, Tetsuro Nakazawa, Atsushi K Kono, Yoshiro Hori, Tetsuya Fukuda, Suzu Kanzaki, Naoaki Yamada, Toshihide Itoh, Kazuro Sugimura, Hiroaki Naito.   

Abstract

We evaluated quantification of calcified carotid stenosis by dual-energy (DE) CTA and dual-energy head bone and hard plaque removal (DE hard plaque removal) and compared the results to those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Eighteen vessels (13 patients) with densely calcified carotid stenosis were examined by dual-source CT in the dual-energy mode (tube voltages 140 kV and 80 kV). Head bone and hard plaques were removed from the dual-energy images by using commercial software. Carotid stenosis was quantified according to NASCET criteria on MIP images and DSA images at the same plane. Correlation between DE CTA and DSA was determined by cross tabulation. Accuracies for stenosis detection and grading were calculated. Stenosis could be evaluated in all vessels by DE CTA after applying DE hard plaque removal. In contrast, conventional CTA failed to show stenosis in 13 out of 18 vessels due to overlapping hard plaque. Good correlation between DE plaque removal images and DSA images was observed (r (2) = 0.9504) for stenosis grading. Sensitivity and specificity to detect hemodynamically relevant (>70%) stenosis was 100% and 92%, respectively. Dual-energy head bone and hard plaque removal is a promising tool for the evaluation of densely calcified carotid stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19277672     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1358-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination-feasibility study.

Authors:  H W Venema; F J Hulsmans; G J den Heeten
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.

Authors:  B Randoux; B Marro; F Koskas; M Duyme; M Sahel; A Zouaoui; C Marsault
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA.

Authors:  S A Josephson; S O Bryant; H K Mak; S C Johnston; W P Dillon; W S Smith
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Bernhard Krauss; Martin Sedlmair; Michael Grasruck; Herbert Bruder; Dominik Morhard; Christian Fink; Sabine Weckbach; Miriam Lenhard; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas Flohr; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Bone-subtraction CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  B F Tomandl; T Hammen; E Klotz; H Ditt; B Stemper; M Lell
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  H M Silvennoinen; S Ikonen; L Soinne; M Railo; L Valanne
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

Authors:  H J Barnett; D W Taylor; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; G G Ferguson; R B Haynes; R N Rankin; G P Clagett; V C Hachinski; D L Sackett; K E Thorpe; H E Meldrum; J D Spence
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Multidetector-row CT angiography in the study of atherosclerotic carotid arteries.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Roberto Sanfilippo; Raimondo Pirisi; Luigi Pascalis; Roberto Montisci; Giorgio Mallarini
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of coronary calcium on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) scans: effect on interpretation and possible solutions.

Authors:  Makmur Andrew; Hoe John
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  A Korn; B Bender; H Brodoefel; T-K Hauser; S Danz; U Ernemann; C Thomas
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Comparison of dual-source CT angiography and MR angiography in preoperative evaluation of intra- and extracranial vessels: a pilot study.

Authors:  Georg Mühlenbruch; Marco Das; Gottfried Mommertz; Meike Schaaf; Stefan Langer; Andreas Horst Mahnken; Joachim Ernst Wildberger; A Thron; Rolf W Günther; Timo Krings
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Assessment of carotid plaque composition using fast-kV switching dual-energy CT with gemstone detector: comparison with extracorporeal and virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Yuki Shinohara; Makoto Sakamoto; Keita Kuya; Junichi Kishimoto; Naoki Iwata; Yasutoshi Ohta; Shinya Fujii; Takashi Watanabe; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Dual energy CT (DECT) of the liver: conventional versus virtual unenhanced images.

Authors:  Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Vitaliano Buffa; Stefano Fedeli; Monica Luzietti; Andrea Vallone; Roberto Ruopoli; Vittorio Miele; Marco Rengo; Pasquale Paolantonio; Michelangelo Maurizi Enrici; Andrea Laghi; Vincenzo David
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Preliminary report on virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kVp switching dual energy head CT: comparable image quality to that of 120-kVp CT without increasing the radiation dose.

Authors:  Kouhei Kamiya; Akira Kunimatsu; Harushi Mori; Jiro Sato; Masaaki Akahane; Takana Yamakawa; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison between 2 unenhanced MRAs and dual-source CTA.

Authors:  P Lv; J Lin; D Guo; H Liu; X Tang; C Fu; J Hu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Comparison of virtual monoenergetic and polyenergetic images reconstructed from dual-layer detector CT angiography of the head and neck.

Authors:  Victor Neuhaus; Nils Große Hokamp; Nuran Abdullayev; Volker Maus; Christoph Kabbasch; Anastasios Mpotsaris; David Maintz; Jan Borggrefe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Maximizing Iodine Contrast-to-Noise Ratios in Abdominal CT Imaging through Use of Energy Domain Noise Reduction and Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT.

Authors:  Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Blooming Artifact Reduction in Coronary Artery Calcification by A New De-blooming Algorithm: Initial Study.

Authors:  Ping Li; Lei Xu; Lin Yang; Rui Wang; Jiang Hsieh; Zhonghua Sun; Zhanming Fan; Jonathon A Leipsic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.