Literature DB >> 17924336

Haplotype-based association analysis via variance-components score test.

Jung-Ying Tzeng1, Daowen Zhang.   

Abstract

Haplotypes provide a more informative format of polymorphisms for genetic association analysis than do individual single-nucleotide polymorphisms. However, the practical efficacy of haplotype-based association analysis is challenged by a trade-off between the benefits of modeling abundant variation and the cost of the extra degrees of freedom. To reduce the degrees of freedom, several strategies have been considered in the literature. They include (1) clustering evolutionarily close haplotypes, (2) modeling the level of haplotype sharing, and (3) smoothing haplotype effects by introducing a correlation structure for haplotype effects and studying the variance components (VC) for association. Although the first two strategies enjoy a fair extent of power gain, empirical evidence showed that VC methods may exhibit only similar or less power than the standard haplotype regression method, even in cases of many haplotypes. In this study, we report possible reasons that cause the underpowered phenomenon and show how the power of the VC strategy can be improved. We construct a score test based on the restricted maximum likelihood or the marginal likelihood function of the VC and identify its nontypical limiting distribution. Through simulation, we demonstrate the validity of the test and investigate the power performance of the VC approach and that of the standard haplotype regression approach. With suitable choices for the correlation structure, the proposed method can be directly applied to unphased genotypic data. Our method is applicable to a wide-ranging class of models and is computationally efficient and easy to implement. The broad coverage and the fast and easy implementation of this method make the VC strategy an effective tool for haplotype analysis, even in modern genomewide association studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17924336      PMCID: PMC2265651          DOI: 10.1086/521558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  22 in total

1.  Bayes estimates of haplotype effects.

Authors:  D C Thomas; J L Morrison; D G Clayton
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Haplotypes vs single marker linkage disequilibrium tests: what do we gain?

Authors:  J Akey; L Jin; M Xiong
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  On the identification of disease mutations by the analysis of haplotype similarity and goodness of fit.

Authors:  Jung-Ying Tzeng; B Devlin; Larry Wasserman; Kathryn Roeder
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The International HapMap Project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Evolutionary-based association analysis using haplotype data.

Authors:  Howard Seltman; Kathryn Roeder; B Devlin
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Hypothesis testing in semiparametric additive mixed models.

Authors:  Daowen Zhang; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Assessing the performance of the haplotype block model of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-08-11       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Application of Bayesian spatial statistical methods to analysis of haplotypes effects and gene mapping.

Authors:  John Molitor; Paul Marjoram; Duncan Thomas
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Estimation and tests of haplotype-environment interaction when linkage phase is ambiguous.

Authors:  S L Lake; H Lyon; K Tantisira; E K Silverman; S T Weiss; N M Laird; D J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  Statistical models for haplotype sharing in case-parent trio data.

Authors:  Andrew S Allen; Glen A Satten
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 0.444

View more
  54 in total

1.  Optimal tests for rare variant effects in sequencing association studies.

Authors:  Seunggeun Lee; Michael C Wu; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Efficient calculation of P-value and power for quadratic form statistics in multilocus association testing.

Authors:  Liping Tong; Jie Yang; Richard S Cooper
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  Powerful SNP-set analysis for case-control genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Michael C Wu; Peter Kraft; Michael P Epstein; Deanne M Taylor; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Genomic similarity and kernel methods I: advancements by building on mathematical and statistical foundations.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Powerful multi-marker association tests: unifying genomic distance-based regression and logistic regression.

Authors:  Fang Han; Wei Pan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  A powerful and flexible multilocus association test for quantitative traits.

Authors:  Lydia Coulter Kwee; Dawei Liu; Xihong Lin; Debashis Ghosh; Michael P Epstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A simple and accurate method to determine genomewide significance for association tests in sequencing studies.

Authors:  Dan-Yu Lin
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Studying gene and gene-environment effects of uncommon and common variants on continuous traits: a marker-set approach using gene-trait similarity regression.

Authors:  Jung-Ying Tzeng; Daowen Zhang; Monnat Pongpanich; Chris Smith; Mark I McCarthy; Michèle M Sale; Bradford B Worrall; Fang-Chi Hsu; Duncan C Thomas; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Power comparisons between similarity-based multilocus association methods, logistic regression, and score tests for haplotypes.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Lin; Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Sequence Kernel Association Analysis of Rare Variant Set Based on the Marginal Regression Model for Binary Traits.

Authors:  Baolin Wu; James S Pankow; Weihua Guan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.