Literature DB >> 20606458

Genomic similarity and kernel methods II: methods for genomic information.

Daniel J Schaid1.   

Abstract

Measures of genomic similarity are often the basis of flexible statistical analyses, and when based on kernel methods, they provide a powerful platform to take advantage of a broad and deep statistical theory, and a wide range of existing software; see the companion paper for a review of this material [1]. The kernel method converts information - perhaps complex or high-dimensional information - for a pair of subjects to a quantitative value representing either similarity or dissimilarity, with the requirement that it must create a positive semidefinite matrix when applied to all pairs of subjects. This approach provides enormous opportunities to enhance genetic analyses by including a wide range of publically-available data as structured kernel 'prior' information. Kernel methods are appealing for their generality, yet this generality can make it challenging to formulate measures of similarity that directly address a specific scientific aim, or that are most powerful to detect a specific genetic mechanism. Although it is difficult to create a cook book of kernels for genetic studies, useful guidelines can be gleaned from a variety of novel published approaches. We review some novel developments of kernels for specific analyses and speculate on how to build kernels for complex genomic attributes based on publically available data. The creativity of analysts, with rigorous evaluations by applications to real and simulated data, will ultimately provide a much stronger array of kernel 'tools' for genetic analyses.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20606458      PMCID: PMC7077756          DOI: 10.1159/000312643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  19 in total

1.  Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites.

Authors:  A Zien; G Rätsch; S Mika; B Schölkopf; T Lengauer; K R Müller
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Quantitative similarity-based association tests using population samples.

Authors:  S Zhang; H Zhao
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-30       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  A probabilistic view of gene function.

Authors:  Andrew G Fraser; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 4.  Bioinformatics approaches and resources for single nucleotide polymorphism functional analysis.

Authors:  Sean Mooney
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  Using linkage genome scans to improve power of association in genome scans.

Authors:  Kathryn Roeder; Silvi-Alin Bacanu; Larry Wasserman; B Devlin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genomewide weighted hypothesis testing in family-based association studies, with an application to a 100K scan.

Authors:  Iuliana Ionita-Laza; Matthew B McQueen; Nan M Laird; Christoph Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes.

Authors:  Vamsi K Mootha; Cecilia M Lindgren; Karl-Fredrik Eriksson; Aravind Subramanian; Smita Sihag; Joseph Lehar; Pere Puigserver; Emma Carlsson; Martin Ridderstråle; Esa Laurila; Nicholas Houstis; Mark J Daly; Nick Patterson; Jill P Mesirov; Todd R Golub; Pablo Tamayo; Bruce Spiegelman; Eric S Lander; Joel N Hirschhorn; David Altshuler; Leif C Groop
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  An integrated approach for the analysis of biological pathways using mixed models.

Authors:  Lily Wang; Bing Zhang; Russell D Wolfinger; Xi Chen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Genomic similarity and kernel methods I: advancements by building on mathematical and statistical foundations.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  Multiple genetic variant association testing by collapsing and kernel methods with pedigree or population structured data.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Jason P Sinnwell; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Studying gene and gene-environment effects of uncommon and common variants on continuous traits: a marker-set approach using gene-trait similarity regression.

Authors:  Jung-Ying Tzeng; Daowen Zhang; Monnat Pongpanich; Chris Smith; Mark I McCarthy; Michèle M Sale; Bradford B Worrall; Fang-Chi Hsu; Duncan C Thomas; Patrick F Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Testing for polygenic effects in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Yue-Ming Chen; Peng Wei
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Massively expedited genome-wide heritability analysis (MEGHA).

Authors:  Tian Ge; Thomas E Nichols; Phil H Lee; Avram J Holmes; Joshua L Roffman; Randy L Buckner; Mert R Sabuncu; Jordan W Smoller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Imaging-wide association study: Integrating imaging endophenotypes in GWAS.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Xu; Chong Wu; Wei Pan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Powerful Genetic Association Analysis for Common or Rare Variants with High-Dimensional Structured Traits.

Authors:  Xiang Zhan; Ni Zhao; Anna Plantinga; Timothy A Thornton; Karen N Conneely; Michael P Epstein; Michael C Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Increasing power for voxel-wise genome-wide association studies: the random field theory, least square kernel machines and fast permutation procedures.

Authors:  Tian Ge; Jianfeng Feng; Derrek P Hibar; Paul M Thompson; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  A network-based kernel machine test for the identification of risk pathways in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Saskia Freytag; Juliane Manitz; Martin Schlather; Thomas Kneib; Christopher I Amos; Angela Risch; Jenny Chang-Claude; Joachim Heinrich; Heike Bickeböller
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  Rare nonsynonymous exonic variants in addiction and behavioral disinhibition.

Authors:  Scott I Vrieze; Shuang Feng; Michael B Miller; Brian M Hicks; Nathan Pankratz; Gonçalo R Abecasis; William G Iacono; Matt McGue
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.