Literature DB >> 15786018

Nonparametric tests of association of multiple genes with human disease.

Daniel J Schaid1, Shannon K McDonnell, Scott J Hebbring, Julie M Cunningham, Stephen N Thibodeau.   

Abstract

The genetic basis of many common human diseases is expected to be highly heterogeneous, with multiple causative loci and multiple alleles at some of the causative loci. Analyzing the association of disease with one genetic marker at a time can have weak power, because of relatively small genetic effects and the need to correct for multiple testing. Testing the simultaneous effects of multiple markers by multivariate statistics might improve power, but they too will not be very powerful when there are many markers, because of the many degrees of freedom. To overcome some of the limitations of current statistical methods for case-control studies of candidate genes, we develop a new class of nonparametric statistics that can simultaneously test the association of multiple markers with disease, with only a single degree of freedom. Our approach, which is based on U-statistics, first measures a score over all markers for pairs of subjects and then compares the averages of these scores between cases and controls. Genetic scoring for a pair of subjects is measured by a "kernel" function, which we allow to be fairly general. However, we provide guidelines on how to choose a kernel for different types of genetic effects. Our global statistic has the advantage of having only one degree of freedom and achieves its greatest power advantage when the contrasts of average genotype scores between cases and controls are in the same direction across multiple markers. Simulations illustrate that our proposed methods have the anticipated type I-error rate and that they can be more powerful than standard methods. Application of our methods to a study of candidate genes for prostate cancer illustrates their potential merits, and offers guidelines for interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15786018      PMCID: PMC1199368          DOI: 10.1086/429838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  16 in total

1.  Effect of allelic heterogeneity on the power of the transmission disequilibrium test.

Authors:  S L Slager; J Huang; V J Vieland
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  A non-parametric approach to translating gene region heterogeneity associated with phenotype into location heterogeneity.

Authors:  J Kowalski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Case-control studies of genetic markers: power and sample size approximations for Armitage's test for trend.

Authors:  S L Slager; D J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  Genomic control for association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  The complex interplay among factors that influence allelic association.

Authors:  Krina T Zondervan; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Best linear unbiased allele-frequency estimation in complex pedigrees.

Authors:  Mary Sara McPeek; Xiaodong Wu; Carole Ober
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size.

Authors:  P D Sasieni
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis.

Authors:  D E Weeks; K Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints.

Authors:  P C O'Brien
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  On the allelic spectrum of human disease.

Authors:  D E Reich; E S Lander
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  66 in total

1.  Powerful SNP-set analysis for case-control genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Michael C Wu; Peter Kraft; Michael P Epstein; Deanne M Taylor; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Genomic similarity and kernel methods I: advancements by building on mathematical and statistical foundations.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  A composite likelihood approach to latent multivariate Gaussian modeling of SNP data with application to genetic association testing.

Authors:  Fang Han; Wei Pan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A constrained-likelihood approach to marker-trait association studies.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Val C Sheffield
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Detecting disease gene in DNA haplotype sequences by nonparametric dissimilarity test.

Authors:  Ao Yuan; Qingqi Yue; Victor Apprey; George Bonney
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Powerful multilocus tests of genetic association in the presence of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Nilanjan Chatterjee; Zeynep Kalaylioglu; Roxana Moslehi; Ulrike Peters; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Complex adaptive system models and the genetic analysis of plasma HDL-cholesterol concentration.

Authors:  Thomas J Rea; Christine M Brown; Charles F Sing
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.416

8.  Powerful multi-marker association tests: unifying genomic distance-based regression and logistic regression.

Authors:  Fang Han; Wei Pan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  A powerful and flexible multilocus association test for quantitative traits.

Authors:  Lydia Coulter Kwee; Dawei Liu; Xihong Lin; Debashis Ghosh; Michael P Epstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Power comparisons between similarity-based multilocus association methods, logistic regression, and score tests for haplotypes.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Lin; Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.