Literature DB >> 20601715

Duck! Scaling the height of a horizontal barrier to body height.

Jeanine K Stefanucci1, Michael N Geuss.   

Abstract

Recent research shows that the body is used to scale environmental extents. We question whether the body is used to scale heights as measured by real actions (Experiments 1 and 2) or by judgments about action and extent made from a single viewpoint (Experiments 3 and 4). First, participants walked under barriers naturally, when wearing shoes, or when wearing a helmet. Participants required a larger margin of safety (they ducked at shorter heights) when they were made taller. In follow-up experiments, participants visually matched barrier heights and judged whether they could walk under them when wearing shoes or a helmet. Only the helmet decreased visually matched estimates; action judgments were no different when participants' eye height increased. The final experiment suggested that the change in matched estimates may have been due to lack of experience wearing the helmet. Overall, the results suggest that perceived height is scaled to the body and that when body height is altered, experience may moderate the rescaling of height.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20601715      PMCID: PMC3298367          DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  23 in total

1.  Learning to throw on a rotating carousel: recalibration based on limb dynamics and projectile kinematics.

Authors:  Hugo Bruggeman; Herbert L Pick; John J Rieser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Evolved navigation theory and the descent illusion.

Authors:  Russell E Jackson; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-04

3.  Action can affect auditory perception.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

4.  Carrying the height of the world on your ankles: encumbering observers reduces estimates of how high an actor can jump.

Authors:  Verónica C Ramenzoni; Michael A Riley; Kevin Shockley; Tehran Davis
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Perceiving affordances for fitting through apertures.

Authors:  Shaziela Ishak; Karen E Adolph; Grace C Lin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Using eye height in different postures to scale the heights of objects.

Authors:  M Wraga
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The various perceptions of distance: an alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Jerome V Danoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Geometric, kinetic-kinematic, and intentional constraints influence willingness to pass under a barrier.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Wagman; Eric A Malek
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2009

9.  Judging and actualizing intrapersonal and interpersonal affordances.

Authors:  Michael J Richardson; Kerry L Marsh; Reuben M Baron
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The roles of altitude and fear in the perception of height.

Authors:  Jeanine K Stefanucci; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  14 in total

1.  Affordances as Probabilistic Functions: Implications for Development, Perception, and Decisions for Action.

Authors:  John Franchak; Karen Adolph
Journal:  Ecol Psychol       Date:  2014

2.  Turning perception on its head: cephalic perception of whole and partial length of a wielded object.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Wagman; Matthew D Langley; Takahiro Higuchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Perceiving affordances for different motor skills.

Authors:  Whitney G Cole; Gladys L Y Chan; Beatrix Vereijken; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Emma C Celano; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor decisions are not black and white: selecting actions in the "gray zone".

Authors:  D M Comalli; D Persand; K E Adolph
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perception-action development from infants to adults: perceiving affordances for reaching through openings.

Authors:  Shaziela Ishak; John M Franchak; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-10-19

8.  Ledge and wedge: younger and older adults' perception of action possibilities.

Authors:  David Comalli; John Franchak; Angela Char; Karen Adolph
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sensory substitution information informs locomotor adjustments when walking through apertures.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Matthew A Timmis; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Imagining one's own and someone else's body actions: dissociation in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Dewi Guardia; Léa Conversy; Renaud Jardri; Gilles Lafargue; Pierre Thomas; Vincent Dodin; Olivier Cottencin; Marion Luyat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.