Literature DB >> 24338434

Gut estimates: Pregnant women adapt to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways.

John M Franchak1, Karen E Adolph.   

Abstract

Possibilities for action depend on the fit between the body and the environment. Perceiving what actions are possible is challenging, because the body and the environment are always changing. How do people adapt to changes in body size and compression? In Experiment 1, we tested pregnant women monthly over the course of pregnancy to determine whether they adapted to changing possibilities for squeezing through doorways. As women gained belly girth and weight, previously passable doorways were no longer passable, but women's decisions to attempt passage tracked their changing abilities. Moreover, their accuracy was equivalent to that of nonpregnant adults. In Experiment 2, nonpregnant adults wore a "pregnancy pack" that instantly increased the size of their bellies, and they judged whether doorways were passable. Accuracy in the "pregnant" participants was only marginally worse than that of actual pregnant women, suggesting that participants adapted to the prosthesis during the test session. In Experiment 3, participants wore the pregnancy pack and gauged passability before and after attempting passage. The judgments were grossly inaccurate prior to receiving feedback. These findings indicate that experience facilitates perceptual-motor recalibration for certain types of actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24338434      PMCID: PMC3981908          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0578-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  34 in total

1.  The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch.

Authors:  Rob Withagen; Claire F Michaels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances.

Authors:  W H Warren; S Whang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  What infants know and what they do: perceiving possibilities for walking through openings.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05

4.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing.

Authors:  W H Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Emma C Celano; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influences of head and torso movement before and during affordance perception.

Authors:  Yawen Yu; Benoit G Bardy; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Learning by doing: action performance facilitates affordance perception.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Dina J van der Zalm; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visual estimation of spatial requirements for locomotion in novice wheelchair users.

Authors:  Takahiro Higuchi; Hajime Takada; Yoshifusa Matsuura; Kuniyasu Imanaka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2004-03

9.  Optimal maternal weight gain during singleton pregnancy.

Authors:  L A Bracero; D W Byrne
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Learning from falling.

Authors:  Amy S Joh; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb
View more
  24 in total

1.  Rate of recalibration to changing affordances for squeezing through doorways reveals the role of feedback.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Frank A Somoano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Anaesthesia changes perceived finger width but not finger length.

Authors:  Lee D Walsh; Damon Hoad; John C Rothwell; Simon C Gandevia; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  To step or to spring: the influence of state anxiety on perceptual judgements and executed action.

Authors:  Sophie Harris; Kate Wilmut
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Flexibility in action: Development of locomotion under overhead barriers.

Authors:  Jaya Rachwani; Orit Herzberg; Brianna E Kaplan; David M Comalli; Sinclaire O'Grady; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2022-03-21

5.  Walking through an aperture with visual information obtained at a distance.

Authors:  Daisuke Muroi; Takahiro Higuchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sensitivity to hierarchical relations among affordances in the assembly of asymmetric tools.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Wagman; Sarah E Caputo; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceiving action boundaries for overhead reaching in a height-related situation.

Authors:  Lisa P Y Lin; Sally A Linkenauger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Plasticity and Awareness of Bodily Distortion.

Authors:  Mariella Pazzaglia; Marta Zantedeschi
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Sleeping on the rubber-hand illusion: Memory reactivation during sleep facilitates multisensory recalibration.

Authors:  Motoyasu Honma; John Plass; David Brang; Susan M Florczak; Marcia Grabowecky; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2016-10-17

10.  How far can I reach? The perception of upper body action capabilities in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Megan Rose Readman; Neil M McLatchie; Ellen Poliakoff; Trevor J Crawford; Sally A Linkenauger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.