Literature DB >> 24370580

Sensory substitution information informs locomotor adjustments when walking through apertures.

Andrew J Kolarik1, Matthew A Timmis, Silvia Cirstea, Shahina Pardhan.   

Abstract

The study assessed the ability of the central nervous system (CNS) to use echoic information from sensory substitution devices (SSDs) to rotate the shoulders and safely pass through apertures of different width. Ten visually normal participants performed this task with full vision, or blindfolded using an SSD to obtain information regarding the width of an aperture created by two parallel panels. Two SSDs were tested. Participants passed through apertures of +0, +18, +35 and +70 % of measured body width. Kinematic indices recorded movement time, shoulder rotation, average walking velocity across the trial, peak walking velocities before crossing, after crossing and throughout a whole trial. Analyses showed participants used SSD information to regulate shoulder rotation, with greater rotation associated with narrower apertures. Rotations made using an SSD were greater compared to vision, movement times were longer, average walking velocity lower and peak velocities before crossing, after crossing and throughout the whole trial were smaller, suggesting greater caution. Collisions sometimes occurred using an SSD but not using vision, indicating that substituted information did not always result in accurate shoulder rotation judgements. No differences were found between the two SSDs. The data suggest that spatial information, provided by sensory substitution, allows the relative position of aperture panels to be internally represented, enabling the CNS to modify shoulder rotation according to aperture width. Increased buffer space indicated by greater rotations (up to approximately 35 % for apertures of +18 % of body width) suggests that spatial representations are not as accurate as offered by full vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24370580     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3809-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Active artificial echolocation and the nonvisual perception of aperture passability.

Authors:  B Hughes
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  What's that sound? Distance determination and aperture passage from ultrasound echoes.

Authors:  Theresa Claire Davies; Shane D Pinder; Catherine M Burns
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2010-12-24

3.  Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision.

Authors:  Laurent Renier; Olivier Collignon; Colline Poirier; Dai Tranduy; Annick Vanlierde; Anne Bol; Claude Veraart; Anne G De Volder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances.

Authors:  W H Warren; S Whang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Echo perception of shape and texture by sighted subjects.

Authors:  S Hausfeld; R P Power; A Gorta; P Harris
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1982-10

7.  Static and dynamic visual information about the size and passability of an aperture.

Authors:  Aaron J Fath; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Human echolocation: pitch versus loudness information.

Authors:  Bo N Schenkman; Mats E Nilsson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Emma C Celano; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Neural correlates of natural human echolocation in early and late blind echolocation experts.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Stephen R Arnott; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Self-motion facilitates echo-acoustic orientation in humans.

Authors:  Ludwig Wallmeier; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.963

2.  An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Echoic Sensory Substitution Information in a Single Obstacle Circumvention Task.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Blindness enhances auditory obstacle circumvention: Assessing echolocation, sensory substitution, and visual-based navigation.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sensory substitution: The affordance of passability, body-scaled perception, and exploratory movements.

Authors:  Carlos de Paz; David Travieso; Jorge Ibáñez-Gijón; Miguel Bravo; Lorena Lobo; David M Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A low-cost 2-D video system can accurately and reliably assess adaptive gait kinematics in healthy and low vision subjects.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Jonathan Allsop; Juan Tabernero; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Other ways of seeing: From behavior to neural mechanisms in the online "visual" control of action with sensory substitution.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; James Gwinnutt; Sara Dell'Erba; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Alexandra A de Sousa; David J Brown
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 9.  Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Alin Moldoveanu; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Oana Balan; Simone Spagnol; Vigdís Vala Valgeirsdóttir; Rúnar Unnthorsson
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.406

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.