Literature DB >> 20596898

Augmented reality haptic (ARH): an approach of electromagnetic tracking in minimally invasive surgery.

J B Pagador1, L F Sánchez, J A Sánchez, P Bustos, J Moreno, F M Sánchez-Margallo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) is a widely used surgical technique that requires a long training process due to its difficulty and complexity. We developed an Augmented Reality Haptic (ARH) System based on electromagnetic tracking devices for use in creation training models (computer-enhanced trainers), in computer-assisted surgery or telemanipulation applications.
METHOD: The ARH system consists currently in a Linux driver and a calibration protocol to acquire the tooltip position of conventional laparoscopic tools in real time. A Polhemus Isotrack(®) II was used to track surgical endoscopic tooltip movements. The receiver was mounted on the tool handle in order to measure laparoscopic tools positions without complex modifications. Two validation tests were done to guarantee the proper functioning of the ARH system in a MIS environment. The first one checks the driver operation and the second measures the accuracy and reliability of the tooltip pose estimation process.
RESULTS: Jitter and orientation errors for the first test were 2.00±0.10 and 2.00±0.09 mm, respectively. Relative position error of 0.25±0.06 cm for a distance of 5 cm was found. Jitter error for the second test was 127 ± 60, 117 ± 40 and 122 ± 39 mm in Z, Y and X rotations, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Results obtained with the ARH system are sufficiently accurate for use in MIS training. A supplementary correction procedure would be necessary to use this ARH system in computer-assisted surgery or telemanipulation.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20596898     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-010-0501-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  21 in total

1.  Design and application of an assessment protocol for electromagnetic tracking systems.

Authors:  Johann B Hummel; Michael R Bax; Michael L Figl; Yan Kang; Calvin Maurer; Wolfgang W Birkfellner; Helmar Bergmann; Ramin Shahidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Design and development of a surgical skills simulation curriculum.

Authors:  David A McClusky; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Systems for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments.

Authors:  M K Chmarra; C A Grimbergen; J Dankelman
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.442

Review 4.  Objective assessment of technical performance.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Skills acquisition and assessment after a microsurgical skills course for ophthalmology residents.

Authors:  Daniel G Ezra; Raj Aggarwal; Michel Michaelides; Narciss Okhravi; Seema Verma; Larry Benjamin; Philip Bloom; Ara Darzi; Paul Sullivan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Simulation in laparoscopic surgery: a concurrent validity study for FLS.

Authors:  George Xeroulis; Adam Dubrowski; Ken Leslie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Participants' opinions of laparoscopic training devices after a basic laparoscopic training course.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Constantine T Frantzides; Christopher Tebbit; Roderick M Quiros
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Physical reality simulation for training of laparoscopists in the 21st century. A multispecialty, multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Alessandro Fichera; Vivek Prachand; Sari Kives; Ronald Levine; Harrith Hasson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Virtual reality and computer-enhanced training devices equally improve laparoscopic surgical skill in novices.

Authors:  Prathima Kanumuri; Sabha Ganai; Eyad M Wohaibi; Ronald W Bush; Daniel R Grow; Neal E Seymour
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  Sanne M B I Botden; Sonja N Buzink; Marlies P Schijven; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  8 in total

1.  Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment.

Authors:  J B Pagador; F M Sánchez-Margallo; L F Sánchez-Peralta; J A Sánchez-Margallo; J L Moyano-Cuevas; S Enciso-Sanz; J Usón-Gargallo; J Moreno
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  A simple sensor calibration technique for estimating the 3D pose of endoscopic instruments.

Authors:  Vasileios Lahanas; Constantinos Loukas; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  An Augmented Reality Endoscope System for Ureter Position Detection.

Authors:  Feng Yu; Enmin Song; Hong Liu; Yunlong Li; Jun Zhu; Chih-Cheng Hung
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  A novel augmented reality simulator for skills assessment in minimal invasive surgery.

Authors:  Vasileios Lahanas; Constantinos Loukas; Nikolaos Smailis; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Prostate Cancer Detection Using Composite Impedance Metric.

Authors:  Shadab Khan; Aditya Mahara; Elias S Hyams; Alan R Schned; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 6.  Application of national testing standards to simulation-based assessments of clinical palpation skills.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Experimental pilot study for augmented reality-enhanced elbow arthroscopy.

Authors:  Michiro Yamamoto; Shintaro Oyama; Syuto Otsuka; Yukimi Murakami; Hideo Yokota; Hitoshi Hirata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Augmented reality in healthcare education: an integrative review.

Authors:  Egui Zhu; Arash Hadadgar; Italo Masiello; Nabil Zary
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.