Literature DB >> 17943607

Systems for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments.

M K Chmarra1, C A Grimbergen, J Dankelman.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (e.g. laparoscopy) requires special surgical skills, which should be objectively assessed. Several studies have shown that motion analysis is a valuable assessment tool of basic surgical skills in laparoscopy. However, to use motion analysis as the assessment tool, it is necessary to track and record the motions of laparoscopic instruments. This article describes the state of the art in research on tracking systems for laparoscopy. It gives an overview on existing systems, on how these systems work, their advantages, and their shortcomings. Although various approaches have been used, none of the tracking systems to date comes out as clearly superior. A great number of systems can be used in training environment only, most systems do not allow the use of real laparoscopic instruments, and only a small number of systems provide force feedback.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17943607     DOI: 10.1080/13645700701702135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol        ISSN: 1364-5706            Impact factor:   2.442


  25 in total

1.  [Quality and objectifiability of training and advanced training in urology].

Authors:  S C Müller; T Strunk; P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Augmented reality haptic (ARH): an approach of electromagnetic tracking in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  J B Pagador; L F Sánchez; J A Sánchez; P Bustos; J Moreno; F M Sánchez-Margallo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation.

Authors:  Carol E Reiley; Henry C Lin; David D Yuh; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Idle time: an underdeveloped performance metric for assessing surgical skill.

Authors:  Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Drew N Rutherford; Rebecca D Ray; Shlomi Laufer; Calvin Kwan; Elaine R Cohen; Andrea Mason; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Magdalena K Chmarra; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Frank-Willem Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Navigation forces during wrist arthroscopy: assessment of expert levels.

Authors:  Miryam C Obdeijn; Tim Horeman; Lisanne L de Boer; Sophie J van Baalen; Philippe Liverneaux; Gabrielle J M Tuijthof
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A simple sensor calibration technique for estimating the 3D pose of endoscopic instruments.

Authors:  Vasileios Lahanas; Constantinos Loukas; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Simulation platforms to assess laparoscopic suturing skills: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elif Bilgic; Motaz Alyafi; Tomonori Hada; Tara Landry; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Virtual reality-based assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using the Leap Motion controller.

Authors:  Vasileios Lahanas; Constantinos Loukas; Konstantinos Georgiou; Hani Lababidi; Dania Al-Jaroudi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future.

Authors:  B M A Schout; A J M Hendrikx; F Scheele; B L H Bemelmans; A J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.