Literature DB >> 27305670

Prostate Cancer Detection Using Composite Impedance Metric.

Shadab Khan, Aditya Mahara, Elias S Hyams, Alan R Schned, Ryan J Halter.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) recurrences are often predicted by assessing the status of surgical margins (SM)- positive surgical margins (PSM) increase the chances of biochemical recurrence by 2-4 times which may lead to PCa recurrence. To this end, an electrical impedance acquisition system with a microendoscopic probe was employed in an ex-vivo study of human prostates. This system measures the tissue bioimpedance over a range of frequencies (1 kHz to 1MHz), and computes a number of Composite Impedance Metrics (CIM). A classifier trained using CIM data can be used to classify tissue as benign or cancerous. The system was used to collect the impedance spectra from 14 excised prostates, which were obtained from men undergoing radical prostatectomy, for a total of 23 cancerous and 53 benign measurements. The data revealed statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences in the impedance properties of the benign and tumorous tissues, and among the measurements taken on the apical, base, and lateral surface of the prostate. Further, in the leave-one-patient-out cross validation, a maximum predictive accuracy of 90.79% was achieved by combining high frequency CIM phase data to train a support vector machine classifier with a radial basis function kernel. The observations are consistent with the physiology and morphology of benign and malignant prostate tissue. CIMs were found to be an effective tool in distinguishing benign from cancerous tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27305670      PMCID: PMC5209243          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2578939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  36 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients.

Authors:  Pierre I Karakiewicz; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Ilias Cagiannos; Phillip D Stricker; Eric Klein; Thomas Cangiano; Fritz H Schröder; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Augmented reality partial nephrectomy: examining the current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Archie Hughes-Hallett; Erik K Mayer; Hani J Marcus; Thomas P Cundy; Philip J Pratt; Ara W Darzi; Justin A Vale
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Robust intraoperative US probe tracking using a monocular endoscopic camera.

Authors:  Uditha L Jayarathne; A Jonathan McLeod; Terry M Peters; Elvis C S Chen
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

4.  Erectile function recovery in patients after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  R Krishnan; D Katz; C J Nelson; J P Mulhall
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.842

5.  Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles.

Authors:  D M Quinlan; J I Epstein; B S Carter; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Reza Z Goharderakhshan; Daniel Sudilovsky; Lauren A Carroll; Gary D Grossfeld; Richard Marn; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Electrical impedance spectroscopy of benign and malignant prostatic tissues.

Authors:  Ryan J Halter; Alan Schned; John Heaney; Alex Hartov; Shannon Schutz; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The feasibility of prostate cancer detection by triple spectroscopy.

Authors:  Georg Salomon; Thorsten Hess; Andreas Erbersdobler; Christian Eichelberg; Siegfried Greschner; Andrey N Sobchuk; Anna K Korolik; Nicolai A Nemkovich; Jürgen Schreiber; Martin Herms; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Do margins matter? The influence of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Scott E Eggener; Adrian V Hernandez; Eric A Klein; Michael W Kattan; David P Wood; Danny M Rabah; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study.

Authors:  Gaëlle Fromont; Hervé Baumert; Xavier Cathelineau; François Rozet; Pierre Validire; Guy Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparative study of separation between ex vivo prostatic malignant and benign tissue using electrical impedance spectroscopy and electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Ethan K Murphy; Aditya Mahara; Shadab Khan; Elias S Hyams; Alan R Schned; Jason Pettus; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  A Review of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Based Composite Metrics for Glycemic Control.

Authors:  Michelle Nguyen; Julia Han; Elias K Spanakis; Boris P Kovatchev; David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  The clinical application of electrical impedance technology in the detection of malignant neoplasms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Angela A Pathiraja; Ruwan A Weerakkody; Alexander C von Roon; Paul Ziprin; Richard Bayford
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 4.  Mini Review: Impedance Measurement in Neuroscience and Its Prospective Application in the Field of Surgical Neurooncology.

Authors:  Tammam Abboud; Dorothee Mielke; Veit Rohde
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.