OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to quantify the time and effort involved in obtaining prenatal consent for the Neonatal Research Network Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial (SUPPORT) and to determine whether the enrolled infants were representative of the eligible population. METHODS:Eligible subjects were likely to deliver in the SUPPORT gestational age window (24-27(6/7)] weeks). Data included who approached the subjects for consent, how often they approached, the duration of each contact, whether consent was obtained, and whether subjects were enrolled in the trial. Eligible, nonenrolled infants entered into the Neonatal Research Network Generic Database throughout the period of SUPPORT enrollment were compared with enrolled infants. RESULTS:A total of 2826 women were identified at 18 sites, 2228 were approached for consent, and 1219 (54.7%) agreed. For 76.9% of those approached, <3 visits (mean: 2.0 +/- 1.2 visits) were required to complete the consent process. Of the 659 infants with consent who were delivered within the study window, 611 were enrolled. Mothers who received a neonatal consultation were more likely to give consent (P < .001). The proportion of infants not exposed to steroids was significantly greater in the nonapproached group than in the approached group (20.0% vs 3.4%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In a trial that involved preterm infants and required prenatal consent, >5 women were identified as being likely to deliver in the SUPPORT gestational age window for each 1 who delivered an enrolled infant.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to quantify the time and effort involved in obtaining prenatal consent for the Neonatal Research Network Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial (SUPPORT) and to determine whether the enrolled infants were representative of the eligible population. METHODS: Eligible subjects were likely to deliver in the SUPPORT gestational age window (24-27(6/7)] weeks). Data included who approached the subjects for consent, how often they approached, the duration of each contact, whether consent was obtained, and whether subjects were enrolled in the trial. Eligible, nonenrolled infants entered into the Neonatal Research Network Generic Database throughout the period of SUPPORT enrollment were compared with enrolled infants. RESULTS: A total of 2826 women were identified at 18 sites, 2228 were approached for consent, and 1219 (54.7%) agreed. For 76.9% of those approached, <3 visits (mean: 2.0 +/- 1.2 visits) were required to complete the consent process. Of the 659 infants with consent who were delivered within the study window, 611 were enrolled. Mothers who received a neonatal consultation were more likely to give consent (P < .001). The proportion of infants not exposed to steroids was significantly greater in the nonapproached group than in the approached group (20.0% vs 3.4%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In a trial that involved preterm infants and required prenatal consent, >5 women were identified as being likely to deliver in the SUPPORT gestational age window for each 1 who delivered an enrolled infant.
Authors: C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup Journal: JAMA Date: 1996-08-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Wade Rich; Neil N Finer; Marie G Gantz; Nancy S Newman; Angelita M Hensman; Ellen C Hale; Kathy J Auten; Kurt Schibler; Roger G Faix; Abbot R Laptook; Bradley A Yoder; Abhik Das; Seetha Shankaran Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Beau Batton; Lei Li; Nancy S Newman; Abhik Das; Kristi L Watterberg; Bradley A Yoder; Roger G Faix; Matthew M Laughon; Barbara J Stoll; Krisa P Van Meurs; Waldemar A Carlo; Brenda B Poindexter; Edward F Bell; Pablo J Sánchez; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Ronald N Goldberg; Abbot R Laptook; Kathleen A Kennedy; Ivan D Frantz; Seetha Shankaran; Kurt Schibler; Rosemary D Higgins; Michele C Walsh Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mark S Schreiner; Dalia Feltman; Thomas Wiswell; Susan Wootton; Cody Arnold; Jon Tyson; John D Lantos Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-10-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ross E McKinney; Laura M Beskow; Daniel E Ford; John D Lantos; Jonathan McCall; Bray Patrick-Lake; Mark J Pletcher; Brian Rath; Hollie Schmidt; Kevin Weinfurt Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Vishal S Kapadia; Lina F Chalak; John E Sparks; James R Allen; Rashmin C Savani; Myra H Wyckoff Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 7.124