Literature DB >> 18304052

Systematic bias introduced by the informed consent process in a diagnostic research study.

Alice M Mitchell1, Jeffrey A Kline.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine population characteristics, outcomes, and reasons for unsuccessful enrollment among potential study subjects approached for written, informed consent in a minimal-risk emergency department (ED) study. The authors hypothesized that the prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) would be lower among study participants and that medical acuity and refusal to provide a blood sample would be the most common reasons for nonparticipation.
METHODS: The authors requested prospective, written, informed consent for a blood sample and follow-up from consecutive ED patients undergoing evaluation for pulmonary embolism (PE) and recorded spontaneously stated reasons for refusal. VTE was diagnosed or excluded using a combination of D-dimer testing and selective computed tomography (CT) angiography of the chest with venography of the lower extremities. The primary outcome was defined by the number of CT scans positive for VTE among ED patients evaluated for PE.
RESULTS: Over 16 weeks, 260 of 287 (91%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 87 to 94%) eligible patients were approached and consent was obtained from 183 patients (64%, 95% CI = 58% to 69%). The prevalence of VTE was 6% among participants and 13% among nonparticipants (95% CI [of the difference] = 1% to 15%). The proportions of African Americans, uninsured, and Medicaid patients were significantly higher among nonparticipants. No significant differences were found in the proportions of nonparticipants who disliked or distrusted research or desired financial reimbursement, compared to those not enrolled due to medical acuity or refused a blood sample.
CONCLUSIONS: These data implicate the written, informed consent process as a significant source of bias on estimated disease prevalence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18304052     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00066.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  8 in total

1.  Coordination and management of multicenter clinical studies in trauma: Experience from the PRospective Observational Multicenter Major Trauma Transfusion (PROMMTT) Study.

Authors:  Mohammad H Rahbar; Erin E Fox; Deborah J del Junco; Bryan A Cotton; Jeanette M Podbielski; Nena Matijevic; Mitchell J Cohen; Martin A Schreiber; Jiajie Zhang; Parsa Mirhaji; Sarah J Duran; Robert J Reynolds; Ruby Benjamin-Garner; John B Holcomb
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  The effect of informed consent on results of a standard upper extremity intake questionnaire.

Authors:  Taylor Buckley; David Mitten; John Elfar
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Antenatal consent in the SUPPORT trial: challenges, costs, and representative enrollment.

Authors:  Wade D Rich; Kathy J Auten; Marie G Gantz; Ellen C Hale; Angelita M Hensman; Nancy S Newman; Neil N Finer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Prospective study of the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy among patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism by contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Alice M Mitchell; Alan E Jones; James A Tumlin; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 5.  The ethics of uninsured participants accessing healthcare in biomedical research: A literature review.

Authors:  Hae Lin Cho; Marion Danis; Christine Grady
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  Alice M Mitchell; Alan E Jones; James A Tumlin; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  The use of delayed telephone informed consent for observational emergency medicine research is ethical and effective.

Authors:  Steven R Offerman; Daniel K Nishijima; Dustin W Ballard; Uli K Chetipally; David R Vinson; James F Holmes
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Waiver of consent in noninterventional, observational emergency research: the PROMMTT experience.

Authors:  Erin E Fox; Eileen M Bulger; Aisha S Dickerson; Deborah J del Junco; Patricia Klotz; Jeanette Podbielski; Nena Matijevic; Karen J Brasel; John B Holcomb; Martin A Schreiber; Bryan A Cotton; Herb A Phelan; Mitchell J Cohen; John G Myers; Louis H Alarcon; Peter Muskat; Charles E Wade; Mohammad H Rahbar
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.313

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.