Literature DB >> 11700677

Experiences of genetic risk: disclosure and the gendering of responsibility.

L d'Agincourt-Canning1.   

Abstract

The question of 'who owns genetic information' is increasingly a focus of ethical inquiry. Applied to predictive testing, several recent critiques suggest that persons with a genetic disorder have a moral duty to disclose that information to other family members. The justification for this obligation is that genetic information belongs to and may benefit not only a single individual, but also members of a biological kinship. This paper considers this issue from a different vantage point: How does gender intersect with the moral duty to disclose genetic information? Scholars have argued that gender is partly comprised of distinct assignments and assumptions of responsibility. Thus, there is a danger that gendered patterns of socialization will make women feel that they should take primary responsibility for disclosing genetic information to others. This article explores issues of responsibility and disclosure of risk information by drawing on an empirical study of women and men who have undergone genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. The research study suggests that disclosure of genetic information is a gendered activity, with both the benefits and burdens of this task falling primarily on women. It also illustrates that when disclosure is understood contextually, it is a far more complicated matter than when viewed through a theoretical lens. The article considers the relevance of these findings on ethical debate and genetic counselling practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11700677     DOI: 10.1111/1467-8519.00234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  62 in total

1.  Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; R Eeles; A Ardern-Jones; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review.

Authors:  Mel Wiseman; Caroline Dancyger; Susan Michie
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  The development of a methodology for examining the process of family communication of genetic test results.

Authors:  Jonathan A Smith; Caroline Dancyger; Melissa Wallace; Chris Jacobs; Susan Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Stigmatization and male identity: Norwegian males' experience after identification as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Nina Strømsvik; Målfrid Råheim; Nina Oyen; Lars Fredrik Engebretsen; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Disclosing cancer genetic information within families: perspectives of counselees and their at-risk relatives.

Authors:  Afsaneh Hayat Roshanai; Claudia Lampic; Richard Rosenquist; Karin Nordin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Guidelines for Teaching Cross-Cultural Clinical Ethics: Critiquing Ideology and Confronting Power in the Service of a Principles-Based Pedagogy.

Authors:  Fern Brunger
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 7.  Evolution of the colored eco-genetic relationship map (CEGRM) for assessing social functioning in women in hereditary breast-ovarian (HBOC) families.

Authors:  June A Peters; Lindsey Hoskins; Sheila Prindiville; Regina Kenen; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands' perceptions.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Veronica Collins; Tiffany Symes; Jane Halliday
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  What do we tell the children? Contrasting the disclosure choices of two HD families regarding risk status and predictive genetic testing.

Authors:  Kathryn Holt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  BRCA patients in Cuba, Greece and Germany: Comparative perspectives on public health, the state and the partial reproduction of 'neoliberal' subjects.

Authors:  Sahra Gibbon; Eirini Kampriani; Andrea Zur Nieden
Journal:  Biosocieties       Date:  2010-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.