Literature DB >> 10935354

Breast and cervical cancer screening for older women: recommendations and challenges for the 21st century.

J S Mandelblatt1, K R Yabroff.   

Abstract

The incidence of both breast and cervical cancer increases with age, and older socioeconomically disadvantaged and minority women are most likely to develop or die of these diseases. Early detection has the potential to decrease the disproportionate burden of disease in these vulnerable groups at a reasonable cost to society. Yet despite impressive overall gains in use of mammography and Pap smears, older women, especially older minority women, remain underrepresented in screening programs. Physician recommendation is one of the most powerful predictors of screening across all age, socioeconomic, and ethnic groups. The overwhelming majority of older women, make one or more physician visits each year, each of which represents an opportunity to screen for breast and cervical cancer. Although older women will accept screening if it is offered by their providers, physicians are less likely to offer it to them than to their younger, white patients. Conflicting professional recommendations for screening older women, leaving older women out of clinical trials of screening efficacy, competing causes of mortality with increasing age, and possible negative attitudes held by physicians and patients all contribute to the underscreening of older women. Cancer control challenges for the next century include defining groups of women most likely to benefit from screening (based on age, disease risk, competing mortality, and quality of life), improving regular use of early detection, educating providers, and conducting research on age-mediated differences in breast or cervical cancer biology that could affect screening recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10935354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)        ISSN: 0098-8421


  12 in total

1.  The use of life expectancy in cancer screening guidelines. Moving with caution from model-based evidence to evidence-based guidelines.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Mammography screening trends: the perspective of African American women born pre/post World War II.

Authors:  Karen Patricia Williams; Athur Mabiso; Yun-Jia Lo; Louis A Penner
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Perceived barriers to mammography among underserved women in a Breast Health Center Outreach Program.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Susan Kraenzle; Bettina F Drake; Masayoshi Oka; Melody S Goodman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Race and ethnic disparities in cervical cancer screening in a safety-net system.

Authors:  Gertrude A Owusu; Susan Brown Eve; Cynthia M Cready; Kenneth Koelln; Fernando Trevino; Ximena Urrutia-Rojas; Joanne Baumer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-09

5.  Language use and the receipt of cancer screening recommendations by immigrant Chinese American women.

Authors:  Wenchi Liang; Judy H Wang; Mei-Yuh Chen; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Understanding cervical cancer after the age of routine screening: Characteristics of cases, treatment, and survival in the United States.

Authors:  Katie E Lichter; Kimberly Levinson; Anne Hammer; Melissa H Lippitt; Anne F Rositch
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Epidemiology of breast cancer in older women: implications for future healthcare.

Authors:  A J Alberg; S Singh
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.271

8.  When Life Got in the Way: How Danish and Norwegian Immigrant Women in Sweden Reason about Cervical Screening and Why They Postpone Attendance.

Authors:  Fatima Azerkan; Catarina Widmark; Pär Sparén; Elisabete Weiderpass; Per Tillgren; Elisabeth Faxelid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mammography screening: views from women and primary care physicians in Crete.

Authors:  Maria Trigoni; Frances Griffiths; Dimitris Tsiftsis; Eugenios Koumantakis; Eileen Green; Christos Lionis
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  The vicious cycle of inadequate early detection: a complementary study on barriers to cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  Corinne R Leach; Nancy E Schoenberg
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.