BACKGROUND: Although breast and cervical cancer deaths have declined due to early screening, detection, and more effective treatment, racial and ethnic disparities persist. This paper describes the study design and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of the Kin Keeper(SM) Cancer Prevention Intervention, a family-focused educational intervention for underserved women applied in a community-based setting to promote health literacy and screening adherence to address cancer disparities. METHODS:Female public health community health workers (CHWs) were trained to administer the intervention. They recruited female clients from their public health program caseload and asked each to assemble two to four adult female family members for the breast and cervical cancer home-based education sessions the CHWs would deliver in English, Spanish or Arabic. We randomized the clients into the kin keeper group (treatment) or the participant client group (control). RESULTS: Complete data were obtained on 514 Black, Latina, and Arab women. Close to half were unemployed and had yearly family income below $20,000. Thirty-four percent had no medical insurance, and 21% had diabetes. Almost 40% had no mammography in the last year. Treatment and control groups were similar on most sociodemographics but showed differences in breast and cervical screening history. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative study demonstrates the implementation of an RCT using community-based participatory research, while delivering cancer prevention educationacross woman's life span with women not connected to the health care system.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although breast and cervical cancer deaths have declined due to early screening, detection, and more effective treatment, racial and ethnic disparities persist. This paper describes the study design and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of the Kin Keeper(SM) Cancer Prevention Intervention, a family-focused educational intervention for underserved women applied in a community-based setting to promote health literacy and screening adherence to address cancer disparities. METHODS: Female public health community health workers (CHWs) were trained to administer the intervention. They recruited female clients from their public health program caseload and asked each to assemble two to four adult female family members for the breast and cervical cancer home-based education sessions the CHWs would deliver in English, Spanish or Arabic. We randomized the clients into the kin keeper group (treatment) or the participant client group (control). RESULTS: Complete data were obtained on 514 Black, Latina, and Arab women. Close to half were unemployed and had yearly family income below $20,000. Thirty-four percent had no medical insurance, and 21% had diabetes. Almost 40% had no mammography in the last year. Treatment and control groups were similar on most sociodemographics but showed differences in breast and cervical screening history. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative study demonstrates the implementation of an RCT using community-based participatory research, while delivering cancer prevention education across woman's life span with women not connected to the health care system.
Authors: S L Norris; F M Chowdhury; K Van Le; T Horsley; J N Brownstein; X Zhang; L Jack; D W Satterfield Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Christie Eheman; S Jane Henley; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Eric J Jacobs; Maria J Schymura; Anne-Michelle Noone; Liping Pan; Robert N Anderson; Janet E Fulton; Betsy A Kohler; Ahmedin Jemal; Elizabeth Ward; Marcus Plescia; Lynn A G Ries; Brenda K Edwards Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Cecilia R Degraffinreid; Stephanie Dickinson; Electra D Paskett Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Ellen Paap; Roland Holland; Gerard J den Heeten; Guido van Schoor; Anita A M Botterweck; André L M Verbeek; Mireille J M Broeders Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-05-30 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Peter Cram; Kenneth G Saag; Yiyue Lou; Stephanie W Edmonds; Sylvie F Hall; Douglas W Roblin; Nicole C Wright; Michael P Jones; Fredric D Wolinsky Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Sarah Abboud; Emily De Penning; Bridgette M Brawner; Usha Menon; Karen Glanz; Marilyn S Sommers Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 2.172