Literature DB >> 15221985

Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival.

Ahmedin Jemal1, Limin X Clegg, Elizabeth Ward, Lynn A G Ries, Xiaocheng Wu, Patricia M Jamison, Phyllis A Wingo, Holly L Howe, Robert N Anderson, Brenda K Edwards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society (ACS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) collaborate annually to provide updated information regarding cancer occurrence and trends in the U.S. This year's report features a special section on cancer survival.
METHODS: Information concerning cancer cases was obtained from the NCI, CDC, and NAACCR and information concerning recorded cancer deaths was obtained from the CDC. The authors evaluated trends in age-adjusted cancer incidence and death rates by regression models and described and compared survival rates over time and across racial/ethnic populations.
RESULTS: Incidence rates for all cancers combined decreased from 1991 through 2001, but stabilized from 1995 through 2001 when adjusted for delay in reporting. The incidence rates for female lung cancer decreased (although not statistically significant for delay adjusted) and mortality leveled off for the first time after increasing for many decades. Colorectal cancer incidence rates also decreased. Death rates decreased for all cancers combined (1.1% per year since 1993) and for many of the top 15 cancers occurring in men and women. The 5-year relative survival rates improved for all cancers combined and for most, but not all, cancers over 2 diagnostic periods (1975-1979 and 1995-2000). However, cancer-specific survival rates were lower and the risk of dying from cancer, once diagnosed, was higher in most minority populations compared with the white population. The relative risk of death from all cancers combined in each racial and ethnic population compared with non-Hispanic white men and women ranged from 1.16 in Hispanic white men to 1.69 in American Indian/Alaska Native men, with the exception of Asian/Pacific Islander women, whose risk of 1.01 was similar to that of non-Hispanic white women.
CONCLUSIONS: The continued measurable declines for overall cancer death rates and for many of the top 15 cancers, along with improved survival rates, reflect progress in the prevention, early detection, and treatment of cancer. However, racial and ethnic disparities in survival and the risk of death from cancer, and geographic variation in stage distributions suggest that not all segments of the U.S. population have benefited equally from such advances. Published 2004 by the American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221985     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  358 in total

1.  Does social selection explain the association between state-level racial animus and racial disparities in self-rated health in the United States?

Authors:  Sarah McKetta; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Charissa Pratt; Lisa Bates; Bruce G Link; Katherine M Keyes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Breast cancer knowledge and early detection among Hispanic women with a family history of breast cancer along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Authors:  Yelena Bird; John Moraros; Matthew P Banegas; Sasha King; Surasri Prapasiri; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-05

3.  Recombinant human endostatin endostar inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in a mouse xenograft model of colon cancer.

Authors:  Yitao Jia; Min Liu; Wangang Huang; Zhenbao Wang; Yutong He; Jianhua Wu; Shuguang Ren; Yingchao Ju; Ruichao Geng; Zhongxin Li
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Impact of cancer therapies on ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Clarisa R Gracia; Mary D Sammel; Ellen Freeman; Maureen Prewitt; Claire Carlson; Anushree Ray; Ashley Vance; Jill P Ginsberg
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening in low-income African Americans in Tennessee.

Authors:  Kushal Patel; Margaret Hargreaves; Jianguo Liu; Donna Kenerson; Rachel Neal; Zudi Takizala; Katina Beard; Helen Pinkerton; Marilyn Burress; Bill Blot
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

6.  Who provides psychosocial follow-up care for post-treatment cancer survivors? A survey of medical oncologists and primary care physicians.

Authors:  Laura P Forsythe; Catherine M Alfano; Corinne R Leach; Patricia A Ganz; Michael E Stefanek; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and mitomycin C chemotherapy regimen in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin N Breyer; Jared M Whitson; Peter R Carroll; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  Defining prognostic factors of survival after external beam radiotherapy treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Y-X Chen; Z-C Zeng; J Fan; Z-Y Tang; J Zhou; M-S Zeng; J-Y Zhang; J Sun
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  The prevalence and prognostic value of BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Electron Kebebew; Julie Weng; Juergen Bauer; Gustavo Ranvier; Orlo H Clark; Quan-Yang Duh; Daniel Shibru; Boris Bastian; Ann Griffin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Female cancer survivors exposed to alkylating-agent chemotherapy have unique reproductive hormone profiles.

Authors:  Lauren Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Allison Schanne; Lara Lechtenberg; Maureen Prewitt; Clarisa Gracia
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.