Literature DB >> 20568916

Screw loosening in the Dynesys stabilization system: radiographic evidence and effect on outcomes.

Chin-Chu Ko1, Hsiao-Wen Tsai, Wen-Cheng Huang, Jau-Ching Wu, Yu-Chun Chen, Yang-Hsin Shih, Hung-Chieh Chen, Ching-Lan Wu, Henrich Cheng.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Dynamic stabilization systems are used to stabilize degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Loosening of the pedicle screws in such nonfusion implants is predictable. This retrospective study evaluated the incidence of screw loosening and its effect on clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Charts, radiographic films, and medical records of 71 consecutive patients who underwent decompression using Dynesys dynamic stabilization for 1- or 2-level lumbar spondylosis were reviewed. Radiographic films were evaluated and compared to detect screw loosening. A visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used for measuring clinical outcome. Statistical analysis was conducted using the chi-square test and Student t-test.
RESULTS: The 71 patients in the study sample had a mean age of 59.2 +/- 11.65 years (range 23-80 years), with slight female predominance (39 women, 32 men). The mean follow-up duration was 16.6 months (range 8-29 months). There were loose screws in 14 of 71 patients (19.7%), for a rate of 4.6% per screw (17 of 368 screws). Most screw loosening occurred in patients >/= 55 years old (13 of 14 patients) although age and sex had no effect on screw loosening (p = 0.233 and 0.109, respectively). Both the loose screw and solid screw groups experienced significant improvement after the surgery in VAS and ODI scores. On the VAS, scores improved from 5.9 +/- 2.99 to 2.1 +/- 2.14 in the loose screw group (p = 0.003), and from 5.7 +/- 3.45 to 2.9 +/- 2.68 in the solid screw group (p < 0.001). For the ODI scale, scores improved from 43.5 +/- 16.78% to 28.0 +/- 18.18% (p = 0.006) in the loose screw group, and from 52.1 +/- 20.92% to 24.6 +/- 19.78% (p < 0.001) in the solid screw group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (p = 0.334 for VAS, p = 0.567 for ODI).
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary study of this pedicle-based dynamic stabilization device for 1- and 2-level lumbar spondylosis shows radiographic evidence of screw loosening in 19.7% of patients and 4.6% of screws. Nonetheless, the loosening of screws has no adverse effect on clinical improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20568916     DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  29 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of a posterior non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Stefanie Erhart; Stefan Unger; Alexander C Disch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Pullout strength after expandable polymethylmethacrylate transpedicular screw augmentation for pedicle screw loosening.

Authors:  Suk-Hyung Kang; Yong Jun Cho; Young-Baeg Kim; Seung Won Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-04-24

4.  Clinical Experiences of Non-fusion Dynamic Stabilization Surgery for Adjacent Segmental Pathology after Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Soo Eon Lee; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-02-03

5.  Market approval processes for new types of spinal devices: challenges and recommendations for improvement.

Authors:  Arno Bisschop; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  In vivo preclinical evaluation of the influence of osteoporosis on the anchorage of different pedicle screw designs.

Authors:  Gianluca Giavaresi; Milena Fini; Roberto Giardino; Francesca Salamanna; Maria Sartori; Veronica Borsari; Silvia Spriano; Chiara M Bellini; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Screw loosening and Migration after Dynesys Implantation.

Authors:  Min Jae Cho; Chun Kee Chung; Chi Heon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

Review 8.  Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; David Volkheimer; Sandra Reitmaier; Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Annette Kienle; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Minimum ten-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Kotryna Veresciagina; Arne Mehrkens; Stefan Schären; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

10.  In vivo compatibility of Dynesys(®) spinal implants: a case series of five retrieved periprosthetic tissue samples and corresponding implants.

Authors:  M Neukamp; C Roeder; S Y Veruva; D W MacDonald; S M Kurtz; M J Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.