Literature DB >> 25480114

In vivo compatibility of Dynesys(®) spinal implants: a case series of five retrieved periprosthetic tissue samples and corresponding implants.

M Neukamp1, C Roeder, S Y Veruva, D W MacDonald, S M Kurtz, M J Steinbeck.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether particulate debris is present in periprosthetic tissue from revised Dynesys(®) devices, and if present, elicits a biological tissue reaction.
METHODS: Five Dynesys(®) dynamic stabilization systems consisting of pedicle screws (Ti alloy), polycarbonate-urethane (PCU) spacers and a polyethylene-terephthalate (PET) cord were explanted for pain and screw loosening after a mean of 2.86 years (1.9-5.3 years). Optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy were used to evaluate wear, deformation and surface damage, and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to assess surface chemical composition of the spacers. Periprosthetic tissue morphology and wear debris were determined using light microscopy, and PCU and PET wear debris by polarized light microscopy.
RESULTS: All implants had surface damage on the PCU spacers consistent with scratches and plastic deformation; 3 of 5 exhibited abrasive wear zones. In addition to fraying of the outer fibers of the PET cords in five implants, one case also evidenced cord fracture. The pedicle screws were unremarkable. Patient periprosthetic tissues around the three implants with visible PCU damage contained wear debris and a corresponding macrophage infiltration. For the patient revised for cord fracture, the tissues also contained large wear particles (>10 μm) and giant cells. Tissues from the other two patients showed comparable morphologies consisting of dense fibrous tissue with no inflammation or wear debris.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate wear accumulation and local tissue responses for explanted Dynesys(®) devices. Polymer wear debris and an associated foreign-body macrophage response were observed in three of five cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25480114     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3705-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

Review 1.  Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement.

Authors:  E Ingham; J Fisher
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  UHMWPE wear debris and tissue reactions are reduced for contemporary designs of lumbar total disc replacements.

Authors:  Sai Y Veruva; Todd H Lanman; Jorge E Isaza; Daniel W MacDonald; Steven M Kurtz; Marla J Steinbeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparison of Dynesys posterior stabilization and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spinal stenosis L4L5.

Authors:  Shang-Won Yu; Shih-Chieh Yang; Ching-Hou Ma; Chin-Hsien Wu; Cheng-Yo Yen; Yuan-Kun Tu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.500

4.  [Long-term results of the Dynesys implant].

Authors:  C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Screw loosening after posterior dynamic stabilization--review of the literature.

Authors:  T Kocak; B Cakir; H Reichel; T Mattes
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.531

Review 6.  Heterotopic ossification: a review.

Authors:  Luc Vanden Bossche; Guy Vanderstraeten
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  In vivo biostability of polymeric spine implants: retrieval analyses from a United States investigational device exemption study.

Authors:  Ming Shen; Kai Zhang; Petra Koettig; William C Welch; John M Dawson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Stefan Schaeren; Ivan Broger; Bernhard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Distinct immunohistomorphologic changes in periprosthetic hip tissues from historical and highly crosslinked UHMWPE implant retrievals.

Authors:  Ryan M Baxter; Allyson Ianuzzi; Theresa A Freeman; Steven M Kurtz; Marla J Steinbeck
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Klaus John Schnake; Stefan Schaeren; Bernard Jeanneret
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy of the Dynesys Hybrid Surgery for Patients with Multi-Segmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Xiao Xiao; Gaoyang Chen; Song Wang; Junliang Liu; Erhu Lin; Ke Chen; Yucheng Xiang; Ke Zhan; Congcong Liu; Zhengbin Yuan; Minjie Yang; Shuyuan Zhong; Wanxin Zhen; Dazhi Yang; Songlin Peng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Bionate Biocompatibility: In Vivo Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Amparo Vanaclocha-Saiz; Vicente Vanaclocha; Carlos Atienza; Pablo Jorda-Gomez; Víctor Primo-Capella; Carlos Barrios; Leyre Vanaclocha
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-08-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.