Literature DB >> 20564398

Association of local capacity for endoscopy with individual use of colorectal cancer screening and stage at diagnosis.

Jennifer S Haas1, Phyllis Brawarsky, Aarthi Iyer, Garrett M Fitzmaurice, Bridget A Neville, Craig Earle, Celia Patricia Kaplan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited capacity for endoscopy in areas in which African Americans and Hispanics live may be a reason for persistent disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and stage at diagnosis.
METHODS: The authors linked data from the National Health Interview Survey on the use of CRC screening and data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare on CRC stage with measures of county capacity for colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy (endoscopy) derived from Medicare claims.
RESULTS: Hispanics lived in counties with less capacity for endoscopy than African Americans or whites (for National Health Interview Survey, an average of 1224, 1569, and 1628 procedures per 100,000 individuals aged > or = 50 years, respectively). Individual use of CRC screening increased modestly as county capacity increased. For example, as the number of endoscopies per 100,000 residents increased by 750, the odds of being screened increased by 4%. Disparities in screening were mitigated or diminished by adjustment for area endoscopy capacity, racial/ethnic composition, and socioeconomic status. Similarly, among individuals with CRC, those who lived in counties with less endoscopy capacity were marginally less likely to be diagnosed at an early stage. Adjustment for area characteristics diminished disparities in stage for Hispanics compared with whites but not African Americans.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the use of CRC screening may require interventions to improve capacity for endoscopy in some areas. The characteristics of the area where an individual resides may in part mediate disparities in CRC screening use for both African Americans and Hispanics, and disparities in cancer stage for Hispanics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20564398      PMCID: PMC2889919          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  40 in total

1.  Effects of physician supply on early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Ferrante; E C Gonzalez; N Pal; R G Roetzheim
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Robert A Hiatt; Carrie Klabunde; Nancy Breen; Judith Swan; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data.

Authors:  C N Klabunde; A L Potosky; J M Legler; J L Warren
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Effect of Medicare coverage on use of invasive colorectal cancer screening tests.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; William Kreuter; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002 Dec 9-23

7.  Cancer survival among US whites and minorities: a SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) Program population-based study.

Authors:  Limin X Clegg; Frederick P Li; Benjamin F Hankey; Kenneth Chu; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-23

8.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

Authors:  Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Volume and yield of screening colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center after change in medicare reimbursement.

Authors:  Devang N Prajapati; Kia Saeian; David G Binion; David M Staff; Joseph P Kim; Benson T Massey; Walter J Hogan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  9 in total

1.  Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jaime Benarroch-Gampel; Kristin M Sheffield; Yu-Li Lin; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Use of annual mammography among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Phyllis Brawarsky; Bridget A Neville; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Michael J Hassett; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Daniel A Sussman; Chyke A Doubeni; Daniel S Anderson; Lukejohn Day; Amar R Deshpande; B Joseph Elmunzer; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Jeanette Mendez; Ma Somsouk; James Allison; Taft Bhuket; Zhuo Geng; Beverly B Green; Steven H Itzkowitz; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Eliminating racial disparities in colorectal cancer in the real world: it took a village.

Authors:  Stephen S Grubbs; Blase N Polite; John Carney; William Bowser; Jill Rogers; Nora Katurakes; Paula Hess; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A Systematic Review of Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Ahana Sen; Bianca Watson; Samir Gupta; Helen Mayo; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Disparities in colostomy reversal after Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis.

Authors:  M C Turner; M D Talbott; C Reed; Z Sun; M L Cox; B Ezekian; K L Sherman; C R Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Reducing racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening is likely to require more than access to care.

Authors:  Jim P Stimpson; José A Pagán; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Availability of Healthcare Resources and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes Among Non-Hispanic White and Non-Hispanic Black Adults.

Authors:  Tomi Akinyemiju; John W Waterbor; Maria Pisu; Justin Xavier Moore; Sean F Altekruse
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-04

Review 9.  Disparities in endoscopy use for colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.