Literature DB >> 12488477

Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: past, present, and future.

Robert A Hiatt1, Carrie Klabunde, Nancy Breen, Judith Swan, Rachel Ballard-Barbash.   

Abstract

The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) has provided data about health behaviors at the national level since 1957. The 1987 and 1992 Cancer Control Supplements to the NHIS, along with other supplemental surveys administered intermittently on self-reported cancer-related behaviors, have contributed to important research and public health purposes. In this article, we reviewed 73 papers published between 1980 and 2001 that used NHIS data, including the first report from the 1998 NHIS, to examine what has been learned from past surveys. Our goal was to facilitate future analyses of recently released data on cancer screening practices from the Cancer Control Supplement to the 2000 NHIS, which is now known as the Cancer Control Module. We categorized the papers according to which of the following three study approaches they used: trends in screening rates, correlates of these rates with factors that may influence screening, and linkages or comparisons of NHIS data with other surveys or sources of information. We summarize knowledge gained in cancer screening for each of these three categories and identify areas that could benefit from more research. We highlight some of the new information available for the first time on the Cancer Control Module of the 2000 NHIS as fresh opportunities for cancer control research. Finally, we describe how the Cancer Control Supplements to the NHIS are integrated with the objectives of and developments in national cancer surveillance research that have emerged from federal planning efforts and collaborations with national partners in cancer surveillance in recent years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12488477     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.24.1837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  57 in total

1.  Effect of tribal language use on colorectal cancer screening among American Indians.

Authors:  Angela A Gonzales; Eva Garroutte; Thanh G N Ton; Jack Goldberg; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-12

2.  The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population.

Authors:  Carol P Somkin; Stephen J McPhee; Tung Nguyen; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Rena Pasick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Concordance of couples' prostate cancer screening recommendations from a decision analysis.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Robert J Volk; Murray D Krahn; Alvah R Cass; Jawaria Gilani; Susan C Weller; Stephen J Spann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  State-based estimates of mammography screening rates based on information from two health surveys.

Authors:  William W Davis; Van L Parsons; Dawei Xie; Nathaniel Schenker; Machell Town; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Assessing endoscopic colorectal screening adherence in an emergency department population.

Authors:  Jennifer Christie; Denise Nassisi; Ilene Wilets; Katherine N DuHamel; Gary Winkel; Rhadjena Hilliard; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Cultural views, language ability, and mammography use in Chinese American women.

Authors:  Wenchi Liang; Judy Wang; Mei-Yuh Chen; Shibao Feng; Bin Yi; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-02-20

Review 7.  Screening for cancer: valuable or not?

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Racial/ethnic differences in self-reported racism and its association with cancer-related health behaviors.

Authors:  Salma Shariff-Marco; Ann C Klassen; Janice V Bowie
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Association of socioeconomic status and receipt of colorectal cancer investigations: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sheldon M Singh; Lawrence F Paszat; Cindy Li; Jingsong He; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Four decades of population health data: the integrated health interview series as an epidemiologic resource.

Authors:  Pamela Jo Johnson; Lynn A Blewett; Steven Ruggles; Michael E Davern; Miriam L King
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.