Literature DB >> 31062196

Disparities in colostomy reversal after Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis.

M C Turner1, M D Talbott2, C Reed3, Z Sun3, M L Cox3, B Ezekian3, K L Sherman3, C R Mantyh3, J Migaly3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis is a common procedure, with highly variable rates and timing of colostomy reversal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of race and insurance coverage on reversal within 2 years of Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis.
METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Database of five states (2007-2010) was queried for patients who had Hartmann's procedure in the setting of diverticulitis. Patients were grouped by race and insurance status, and multivariable adjustment was performed to evaluate rate and timing of colostomy takedown at 2 years.
RESULTS: Among 11,019 patients who had Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis, 6900 (69%) patients had colostomy reversal by 2 years, with a median time to reversal of 19 weeks. Compared to white patients with private insurance, combinations of black race and non-private insurance significantly reduced likelihood of colostomy reversal at 2 years across all combinations. Black patients without insurance had the lowest likelihood of reversal at 2 years (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.51, p < 0.001). For patients who had colostomy reversal within 2 years, black patients without insurance had a significant delay in time to reversal (11 weeks, 95% CI 6-16, p < 0.001) compared to white patients with private insurance, and delays persisted across all other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Black patients and those without private insurance experienced significantly lower rates of, and delayed time to, colostomy reversal compared to white patients with private insurance. These disparities must be considered for allocation of resources in marginalized communities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colostomy; Diverticulitis; Ethnic groups; Hartmann’s procedure; Health; Healthcare disparities; Insurance; Medically uninsured; Population groups

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31062196     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-01995-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  24 in total

1.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Elizabeth Ward; Betsy A Kohler; Christie Eheman; Ann G Zauber; Robert N Anderson; Ahmedin Jemal; Maria J Schymura; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Laura C Seeff; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; S Luuk Goede; Lynn A G Ries
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Racial and geographic variations in colectomy rates among hospitalized ulcerative colitis patients.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Nguyen; Thomas A Laveist; Susan Gearhart; Theodore M Bayless; Steven R Brant
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Effect of race and insurance status on presentation, treatment, and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for diverticulitis.

Authors:  Anne O Lidor; Susan L Gearhart; Albert W Wu; David C Chang
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-12

4.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure following acute diverticulitis: is timing everything?

Authors:  Fergal J Fleming; Peter Gillen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Factors associated with ostomy reversal.

Authors:  Sanjay Daluvoy; Florencia Gonzalez; Khashayar Vaziri; Adheesh Sabnis; Fredrick Brody
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Jean A Shapiro; Laura C Seeff; Trevor D Thompson; Marion R Nadel; Carrie N Klabunde; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Racial disparities in rectal cancer treatment: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Arden M Morris; Kevin G Billingsley; Nancy N Baxter; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-02

8.  Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States.

Authors:  Helen I Meissner; Nancy Breen; Carrie N Klabunde; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Racial disparities in the use of and indications for colorectal procedures in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Quality of life among five-year survivors after treatment for very low rectal cancer with or without a permanent abdominal stoma.

Authors:  C Fucini; R Gattai; C Urena; L Bandettini; C Elbetti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  3 in total

1.  Permanent stoma: a quality outcome in treatment of rectal cancer and its impact on length of stay.

Authors:  Riccardo Lemini; Iktej S Jabbal; Krystof Stanek; Shalmali R Borkar; Aaron C Spaulding; Scott R Kelley; Dorin T Colibaseanu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Socioeconomic disparities in ostomy reversal among older adults with diverticulitis are more substantial among non-Hispanic Black patients.

Authors:  Trista D Reid; Riju Shrestha; Lucas Stone; Jared Gallaher; Anthony G Charles; Paula D Strassle
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.348

3.  Comparison of Diversion Strategies for Management of Acute Complicated Diverticulitis in a US Nationwide Cohort.

Authors:  Yas Sanaiha; Joseph Hadaya; Esteban Aguayo; Formosa Chen; Peyman Benharash
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.