Literature DB >> 12526957

Volume and yield of screening colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center after change in medicare reimbursement.

Devang N Prajapati1, Kia Saeian, David G Binion, David M Staff, Joseph P Kim, Benson T Massey, Walter J Hogan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Starting July 1, 2001, Medicare began to reimburse for screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic adults older than 50 yr with no risk factors for colorectal cancer. We sought to determine the short-term impact of the change in Medicare reimbursement on the demand for and yield of screening colonoscopy at our tertiary institution.
METHODS: Asymptomatic patients older than 50 referred for first screening colonoscopy after the change in Medicare reimbursement from July 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001 were compared with a similar cohort screened before Medicare coverage for a family history of cancer or polyps during the same months the previous year (July 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000). Patient demographics, number, size, location, and histology of polyps/cancers for these screening colonoscopies were collected.
RESULTS: A total of 1282 colonoscopies were performed in our institution from July 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001, 257 (20%) for screening. During the same months in the previous year, 121 of 938 colonoscopies (12.9%) were for screening (p < 0.01). This was a 55% increase in the percentage of colonoscopies performed for screening, and a 112% increase in the number of screening colonoscopies. Patients screened after the change in Medicare reimbursement were on average 5 yr older compared with patients of the previous year (62 +/- 10 [mean +/- SD] vs 56 +/- 9 yr; p < 0.01). A total of 61 screening colonoscopies (24%) performed after the change in Medicare reimbursement had adenomatous lesions, compared with 25 (21%) screened for family history (p = ns). The number of adenomas 10 mm or larger or cancers did not differ significantly between the two groups (17 in 2001 vs 12 in 2000; p = ns). Age of 65 or older was associated with detection of adenomatous lesions (OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.01-2.9013).
CONCLUSIONS: Since the change in Medicare reimbursement, there has been a significant increase in the number and proportion of colonoscopies performed for screening at our institution. Patients screened since this change are older, and the detection rate of neoplastic lesions is similar to those previously screened for a family history of colorectal cancer or polyps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12526957     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07172.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  11 in total

1.  Relationship of colonoscopy completion rates and endoscopist features.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Risk factors for colonoscopic perforation: a population-based study of 80118 cases.

Authors:  Uzair Hamdani; Raza Naeem; Fyeza Haider; Pardeep Bansal; Michael Komar; David L Diehl; H Lester Kirchner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Predictors of colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Amanpal Singh; Yong-Fang Kuo; Taylor S Riall; G S Raju; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Association of local capacity for endoscopy with individual use of colorectal cancer screening and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Phyllis Brawarsky; Aarthi Iyer; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Bridget A Neville; Craig Earle; Celia Patricia Kaplan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.

Authors:  James S Goodwin; Amanpal Singh; Nischita Reddy; Taylor S Riall; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-09

6.  Factors contributing to patient nonattendance at open-access endoscopy.

Authors:  Suryakanth R Gurudu; Lucía C Fry; David E Fleischer; Bradford H Jones; Marlene R Trunkenbolz; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Do indication and demographics for colonoscopy affect completion? A large national database evaluation.

Authors:  Maneesh Gupta; Jennifer L Holub; Glenn Eisen
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.566

8.  The association between state mandates of colorectal cancer screening coverage and colorectal cancer screening utilization among US adults aged 50 to 64 years with health insurance.

Authors:  Vilma Cokkinides; Priti Bandi; Mona Shah; Katherine Virgo; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Persistent demographic differences in colorectal cancer screening utilization despite Medicare reimbursement.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; William Kreuter; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Determinants of Bowel Preparation Quality and Its Association With Adenoma Detection: A Prospective Colonoscopy Study.

Authors:  Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Victor C W Chan; Thomas Y T Lam; Arthur K C Luk; Raymond S Y Tang; Sunny H Wong; Siew C Ng; Simon S M Ng; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.