Literature DB >> 10644959

Sister chromatid exchanges and ion release in patients wearing fracture fixation devices.

L Savarino1, S Stea, D Granchi, M Visentin, G Ciapetti, M E Donati, G Rollo, G Zinghi, A Pizzoferrato, L Montanaro, A Toni.   

Abstract

The quantification of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) during mitosis is a useful index for evaluating genotoxic effects in subjects occupationally or incidentally exposed to potentially toxic substances. The authors investigated the hypothesis that ions released by corrosion from prosthetic components of fracture fixation devices are associated with change in SCE incidence. In the present study, ten patients with implants were examined, and fifteen subjects with no implants were used as controls. SCE and high frequency cell (HFC) numbers were evaluated in circulating lymphocytes. In addition, nickel (Ni) and chromium (Cr) ion values in the serum were measured because, after iron, these metals are major components of stainless steel. A significant increase in SCE numbers was observed in patients compared to the control population (4.9 +/- 1.3 vs. 3.5 +/- 1.4). Ni concentration was 1.71 +/- 1.49 ng/mL in patients and 0.72 +/- 0.52 ng/mL in control subjects; Cr concentration was, respectively, 1.01 +/- 0.77 ng/mL and 0.19 +/- 0. 27 ng/mL. The increase of serum Cr and Ni was statistically significant. No correlation was found between the increased Cr concentrations and SCE number while Cr ion levels were found to be significantly correlated to HFC. An inverse correlation between Ni level and SCE numbers was observed. Our findings suggest that Cr release by stainless steel implants could have a genotoxic effect; thus it would be useful to carefully monitor implanted subjects with regard to serum ion dosage, SCE analysis, and HFC evaluation. In any case, it would be appropriate to remove the implant when fracture fixation is reached. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10644959     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(200004)50:1<21::aid-jbm4>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  5 in total

1.  Do ion levels in hip resurfacing differ from metal-on-metal THA at midterm?

Authors:  A Moroni; L Savarino; M Hoque; M Cadossi; N Baldini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does ion release differ between hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Antonio Moroni; Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Do ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing differ from those in metal-on-metal THA at long-term followup?

Authors:  Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Eugenio Chiarello; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Effects of metal-on-metal wear on the host immune system and infection in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anton H Hosman; Henny C van der Mei; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Henk J Busscher; Danielle Neut
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  A review of the biologic effects of spine implant debris: Fact from fiction.

Authors:  Nadim James Hallab
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2009-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.