Literature DB >> 20543360

Healthcare IT usability and suitability for clinical needs: challenges of design, workflow, and contractual relations.

Ross Koppel1, David A Kreda.   

Abstract

While healthcare information technology (HIT) offers extraordinary promise of clinical improvement and greater efficiencies, the realization of the promise must confront and overcome a number of challenges caused by incomplete and inappropriate software design. In this paper, we review several types of HIT design and workflow decisions that limit the value and utility of HIT in electronic health (medical) record (EHR/EMR), computerized physician order entry (CPOE), and electronic medication administration record (eMAR) systems. While remedies for problems of design or workflow may be either easy or difficult, , the industry creates additional barriers in the contractual relationships it creates between itself (HIT vendors) and the clinical facilities (hospitals, clinics, and physician offices) that purchase its systems. We suggest that the structure of those relationships may retard the progress and responsiveness of HIT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20543360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  15 in total

1.  Leveraging electronic tablets for general pediatric care: a pilot study.

Authors:  V Anand; S McKee; T M Dugan; S M Downs
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Automated Screening of Hospitalized Children for Influenza Vaccination.

Authors:  Ari H Pollack; Matthew P Kronman; Chuan Zhou; Danielle M Zerr
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.164

3.  Design challenges for electronic medication administration record systems in residential aged care facilities: a formative evaluation.

Authors:  A Tariq; E Lehnbom; K Oliver; A Georgiou; C Rowe; T Osmond; J Westbrook
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 4.  Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.

Authors:  Raj Ratwani; Terry Fairbanks; Erica Savage; Katie Adams; Michael Wittie; Edna Boone; Andrew Hayden; Janey Barnes; Zach Hettinger; Andrew Gettinger
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 5.  Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.

Authors:  R S Evans
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-05-20

6.  Automated primary care screening in pediatric waiting rooms.

Authors:  Vibha Anand; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Evaluating measures of redundancy in clinical texts.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Serguei Pakhomov; Bridget T McInnes; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

8.  Informatics and interaction: Applying human factors principles to optimize the design of clinical decision support for sepsis.

Authors:  Laura Schubel; Danielle L Mosby; Joseph Blumenthal; Muge Capan; Ryan Arnold; Rebecca Kowalski; F Jacob Seagull; Ken Catchpole; J Sanford Schwartz; Ella Franklin; Robin Littlejohn; Kristen E Miller
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  An Integrated Model for Patient Care and Clinical Trials (IMPACT) to support clinical research visit scheduling workflow for future learning health systems.

Authors:  Chunhua Weng; Yu Li; Solomon Berhe; Mary Regina Boland; Junfeng Gao; Gregory W Hruby; Richard C Steinman; Carlos Lopez-Jimenez; Linda Busacca; George Hripcsak; Suzanne Bakken; J Thomas Bigger
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Moving toward a sociotechnical systems approach to continuous health information technology design: the path forward for improving electronic health record usability and reducing clinician burnout.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Megan E Salwei
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.