Literature DB >> 25589911

Design challenges for electronic medication administration record systems in residential aged care facilities: a formative evaluation.

A Tariq1, E Lehnbom1, K Oliver1, A Georgiou1, C Rowe2, T Osmond2, J Westbrook1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Electronic medication administration record (eMAR) systems are promoted as a potential intervention to enhance medication safety in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). The purpose of this study was to conduct an in-practice evaluation of an eMAR being piloted in one Australian RACF before its roll out, and to provide recommendations for system improvements.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary team conducted direct observations of workflow (n=34 hours) in the RACF site and the community pharmacy. Semi-structured interviews (n=5) with RACF staff and the community pharmacist were conducted to investigate their views of the eMAR system. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach to identify challenges associated with the design of the eMAR system.
RESULTS: The current eMAR system does not offer an end-to-end solution for medication management. Many steps, including prescribing by doctors and communication with the community pharmacist, are still performed manually using paper charts and fax machines. Five major challenges associated with the design of eMAR system were identified: limited interactivity; inadequate flexibility; problems related to information layout and semantics; the lack of relevant decision support; and system maintenance issues. We suggest recommendations to improve the design of the eMAR system and to optimize existing workflows. DISCUSSION: Immediate value can be achieved by improving the system interactivity, reducing inconsistencies in data entry design and offering dedicated organisational support to minimise connectivity issues. Longer-term benefits can be achieved by adding decision support features and establishing system interoperability requirements with stakeholder groups (e.g. community pharmacies) prior to system roll out. In-practice evaluations of technologies like eMAR system have great value in identifying design weaknesses which inhibit optimal system use.

Keywords:  Medication administration; electronic medication administration records; formative evaluation; residential aged care facilities; system design

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25589911      PMCID: PMC4287675          DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2014-08-RA-0062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  31 in total

1.  The contextual nature of medical information.

Authors:  M Berg; E Goorman
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Unintended adverse consequences of introducing electronic health records in residential aged care homes.

Authors:  Ping Yu; Yiting Zhang; Yang Gong; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Technology utilization to prevent medication errors.

Authors:  Allison Forni; Hanh T Chu; John Fanikos
Journal:  Curr Drug Saf       Date:  2010-01

4.  Healthcare IT usability and suitability for clinical needs: challenges of design, workflow, and contractual relations.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; David A Kreda
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2010

Review 5.  The effectiveness of integrated health information technologies across the phases of medication management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  K Ann McKibbon; Cynthia Lokker; Steven M Handler; Lisa R Dolovich; Anne M Holbrook; Daria O'Reilly; Robyn Tamblyn; Brian J Hemens; Runki Basu; Sue Troyan; Pavel S Roshanov
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism.

Authors:  B Kaplan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration system.

Authors:  Nick Barber; Tony Cornford; Ela Klecun
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-08

8.  Preventing medication errors in long-term care: results and evaluation of a large scale web-based error reporting system.

Authors:  Stephanie Pierson; Richard Hansen; Sandra Greene; Charlotte Williams; Roger Akers; Mattias Jonsson; Timothy Carey
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-08

9.  Towards an integrative cognitive-socio-technical approach in health informatics: analyzing technology-induced error involving health information systems to improve patient safety.

Authors:  E M Borycki; A W Kushniruk
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2010-09-15

10.  Does the implementation of an electronic prescribing system create unintended medication errors? A study of the sociotechnical context through the analysis of reported medication incidents.

Authors:  Sabi Redwood; Anna Rajakumar; James Hodson; Jamie J Coleman
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  5 in total

1.  Improving Bridging from Informatics Theory to Practice.

Authors:  R Haux; S Koch
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Unmet Needs for Transdermal Patch Management in Electronic Medication Administration Records: An Analysis of Data from 66 Aged Care Facilities.

Authors:  Magdalena Z Raban; Melissa T Baysari; Mikaela L Jorgensen; Amina Tariq; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Disjointed medication management systems in aged care.

Authors:  Rohan A Elliott; Jonathan Ramachenderan
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2017-08-01

4.  Nursing Information Flow in Long-Term Care Facilities.

Authors:  Quan Wei; Karen L Courtney
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Electronic Prescribing and Medication Management at a Residential Aged Care Facility: Uptake by General Practitioners and Qualitative Evaluation of the Benefits and Barriers.

Authors:  Rohan A Elliott; Cik Yin Lee; Safeera Y Hussainy
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.