| Literature DB >> 31081460 |
Laura Schubel1,1, Danielle L Mosby2,1, Joseph Blumenthal1,1, Muge Capan3,1, Ryan Arnold4,1, Rebecca Kowalski1,1, F Jacob Seagull5,1, Ken Catchpole6,1, J Sanford Schwartz7,1, Ella Franklin1, Robin Littlejohn1, Kristen E Miller1.
Abstract
In caring for patients with sepsis, the current structure of electronic health record systems allows clinical providers access to raw patient data without imputation of its significance. There are a wide range of sepsis alerts in clinical care that act as clinical decision support tools to assist in early recognition of sepsis; however, there are serious shortcomings in existing health information technology for alerting providers in a meaningful way. Little work has been done to evaluate and assess existing alerts using implementation and process outcomes associated with health information technology displays, specifically evaluating clinician preference and performance. We developed graphical model displays of two popular sepsis scoring systems, quick Sepsis Related Organ Failure Assessment and Predisposition, Infection, Response, Organ Failure, using human factors principles grounded in user-centered and interaction design. Models will be evaluated in a larger research effort to optimize alert design to improve the collective awareness of high-risk populations and develop a relevant point-of-care clinical decision support system for sepsis.Entities:
Keywords: clinical decision support; human factors; sepsis; usability; user-centered design
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31081460 PMCID: PMC6851411 DOI: 10.1177/1460458219839623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Informatics J ISSN: 1460-4582 Impact factor: 2.681